Search for: "Christian Louboutin S.A."
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 7:06 am
Because in a decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:04 pm
Because in a decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In September, the Second Circuit issued a widely anticipated opinion regarding in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:14 am
Elvis Costello's 1977 hit song "The Angels Want to Wear My Red Shoes" might be an appropriate theme song for the high profile fashion trademark case that was brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York earlier last month by the designer Christian Louboutin, Christian Louboutin S.A. and Christian Louboutin LLC ("Christian Louboutin") against Yves Saint… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
On August 10, 2011, Judge Victor Marrero denied Christian Louboutin S.A.'s motion for a preliminary injunction to enforce its U.S. trademark (Registration No. 3,361,597) for "lacquered red soles on footwear" covering "Women's High Fashion Designer Footwear" in International Class 25. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:32 am
In the case of Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York, in its August 10, 2011 decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was said, in the important ruling in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent 29-30- that:‘We conclude, based on the record before us, that Louboutin has not established secondary meaning in an application of a red sole to a red shoe, but only where the red sole contrasts with the “upper” of the shoe. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm
The case cite is Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:29 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
At long last, here is a pdf link to the decision, and here is the Second Circuit Court of Appeals summary in a nutshell: “We conclude that the District Court’s holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:12 am
* Brief of Amicus Curiae International Trademark Association in Support of Vacatur and Remand, Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:42 am
See Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
