Search for: "Civil Right Evaluation - Division" Results 1 - 20 of 1,259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 6:33 am by Howard | Nassiri, PC
The Civil Rights Division has itself opened 38 investigations into reports of lending discrimination, and more may be coming. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As is relevant here, former Civil Rights Law §50-a provided, with limited exceptions, that "[a]ll personnel records [of law enforcement officers] used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion ... shall be considered confidential and not subject to inspection or review" (see Matter of New York Civ. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As is relevant here, former Civil Rights Law §50-a provided, with limited exceptions, that "[a]ll personnel records [of law enforcement officers] used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion ... shall be considered confidential and not subject to inspection or review" (see Matter of New York Civ. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by Cassandra J. Neugold
On March 2, 2020, the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights (“DCR”) issued a Guidance Memorandum on the Diane B. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:16 pm by Adam Santucci
During his address, President Obama stated that the Civil Rights Division (CRD) of the Department of Justice (DOJ) will begin aggressively pursuing employment discrimination claims. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied the PBA's motion for a preliminary injunction on the grounds that the PBA "could not maintain this hybrid action because there is no private right of action under Civil Rights Law §50-a. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied the PBA's motion for a preliminary injunction on the grounds that the PBA "could not maintain this hybrid action because there is no private right of action under Civil Rights Law §50-a. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that Civil Rights Law §50-a (1) exempts from disclosure the "personnel records" of police officers that are "used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion," the Appellate Division rejected Hearst’s contention that information created or collected pursuant to a misconduct investigation is not protected by Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) unless agency can establish that it was… [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:35 am
This, said the Appellate Division, provided it with "the opportunity to construe for the first time the Local Civil Rights Restoration Act of 2005 (Local Law No. 85 of City of New York [2005]). [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied the PBA's petition, ruling that the PBA could not maintain the hybrid action "because there is no private right of action under Civil Rights Law §50-a" and granted New York City's cross motion to dismiss the PBA's petition.PBA appealed the Supreme Court's ruling, which was subsequently unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division but on grounds that differed significantly from those articulated by the lower… [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied the PBA's petition, ruling that the PBA could not maintain the hybrid action "because there is no private right of action under Civil Rights Law §50-a" and granted New York City's cross motion to dismiss the PBA's petition.PBA appealed the Supreme Court's ruling, which was subsequently unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division but on grounds that differed significantly from those articulated by the lower… [read post]