Search for: "Clark v. State of Missouri" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The Supreme Court has mentioned in passing that the Eleventh Amendment does not afford “local school boards” immunity from suit, Missouri v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
Resolution of this dispute will have a significant bearing on the title questions involving the Missouri and the Clark’s Fork Rivers. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by WIMS
The case concerns three rivers [the Missouri River, the Madison River, and the Clark Fork River] which flow through Montana and then beyond its borders. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
The case concerns three rivers [the Missouri River, the Madison River, and the Clark Fork River] which flow through Montana and then beyond its borders. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am by Andrew Koppelman
As a recent district court decision striking down a similar Missouri law explains, “[t]he State’s ‘permission to marry’ depends on the gender of the would-be participants. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The (now former) property owner filed a cert petition, asking the Supreme Court to review these Questions Presented: The Montana Supreme Court held on a summary judgment record that the State of Montana owns the riverbeds under more than 500 miles of river, including the riverbeds under multiple hydropower facilities on the upper Missouri, Madison, and Clark Fork rivers. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
The scheme ran into trouble when the Attorney General of Missouri issued proceedings against the scheme under the state’s consumer protection legislation, and it soon became clear that other similar proceedings would inevitably follow. [read post]