Search for: "Clear v. United States of America"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service, 587 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
United Kingdom International Extradition Treaty with the United States EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND March 31, 2003, Date-Signed April 26, 2007, Date-In-Force Mr. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:36 pm
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:13 am
One such case that was affected by Bruen was United States of America v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
To the Senate of the United States: With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Hungary on Extradition, signed at Budapest on December 1, 1994. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
PROTOCOL TO THE TREATY BETWEEN ROMANIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS OVERVIEW The Protocol to the Treaty between Romania and the United States of America on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (the ‘‘Protocol’’) serves to implement, as between the United States and Romania, the provisions of the 2003 Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance between… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am
In giving the lead majority judgment Lord Mance stated that although the present situation may not have been foreseen by the legislature, it is not a reason for reading into clear legislation a specific exemption which would not reflect the scope of any exemption in EU law. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
United States of America. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Ground (1): That the present situation might not have been foreseen by the legislature is not a reason for reading into clear legislation a specific exemption which would not reflect the scope of any exemption in EU law, especially when the foreign state could have invoked state immunity but did not do so in time. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:59 pm
Callidus Software, Inc., the Court reversed and remanded a United States District Court for the District of Delaware's denial of a motion to stay. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:51 am
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:52 am
In a recent Rolling Stone article entitled “The Scam Wall Street Learned From the Mafia: How America's biggest banks took part in a nationwide bid-rigging conspiracy - until they were caught on tape,” by consumer reporter Matt Taibbi writes about a financial corruption trial against three bank executives in the case United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
In two previous blogs, here and here , we have discussed the United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
