Search for: "Coach, Inc. et al v. Brown" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cotter, et al., Integrating the Right of Publicity with First Amendment and Copyright Preemption Analysis, 33 Colum. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
According to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Brown, to violate the Lanham Act there must be no artistic relevance to the underlying work whatsoever, or in the event there is, the use must be explicitly misleading. [27]Maximum’s Nearly Identical ArgumentCMG echoes Brown’s argument with regard to the Lanham Act, alleging that Maximum’s use of General Patton is causing consumer confusion as to any involvement and endorsement. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:56 am by David J. DePaolo
This is offensive to many fans, who complain that football is by its nature a violent sport, that players are paid a lot of money to engage in the sport and that they should stop crying.The collective bargaining agreements that the players sign contain jurisdictional clauses for workers' compensation purposes to limit forum shopping so that players can not avail themselves of California law or other liberal work comp state laws.WorkCompCentral legal editor, Sherri Okamoto, this morning writes… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
The Gridiron Battle In 2009, legendary Cleveland Browns football player Jim Brown sued Electronic Arts and Sony, claiming they had violated the Lanham Act by including his image and stats in EA’s Madden Football series. [25] EA had licensed current NFL players through the NFL Players Association, but as an NLF retiree, Brown was not included. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]