Search for: "Constitution Party of South Dakota"
Results 1 - 20
of 376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am
South Dakota has an attorney general with backbone. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:22 pm
[JURIST] A ballot measure to prohibit holders of government contracts totaling more than $100,000 from contributing to political parties or candidates appeared to win narrow approval from Colorado voters Tuesday, while a similar measure in South Dakota was easily rejected. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 1:41 pm
South Dakota's governor, who would appoint any temporary replacement, is a Republican. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
South Dakota: The House Judiciary committee voted 13-0 to kill HJR 1004, a proposed constitutional amendment that reader “No such court [i.e. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:28 am
Our brief argues that the South Dakota law is constitutional, but Quill need not be overturned. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The case is South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Shifts in North and South Dakota accounted for the Democrats’ modest losses. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
On May 11, 2023, the federal district court in Rapid City, South Dakota, concluded that the South Dakota motor vehicle dealer law did not provide an exclusive list of “good cause” franchise terminations. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 10:50 am
While regimes with similar rules to South Dakota will likely pass constitutional muster, other broader or more burdensome regimes may not.South Dakota v Wayfair, Inc., 585 U. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 am
A four state U.S.A. would lead to immediate secession of either the Northeast or the South. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Last week, the South Dakota Senate removed South Dakota AG Jason Ravnsborg from office. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:01 am
SOUTH DAKOTA v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
But now assume, which is altogether possible, that the Republican majority of delegations results substantially from the illegitimate weight held by small states (e.g., Idaho, Alaska, North and South Dakota, Wyoming), which will have the same weight as, say, California, New York, Illinois, Michigan, and Virginia, as well, and just as importantly, from illegitimate partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
In addition to testifying frequently before this Committee and its subcommittees on this topic, we also were the only entity asked by both parties in the South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
The plaintiffs argued that South Dakota’s constitutional guarantee of “open courts,” S.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
The plaintiffs argued that South Dakota’s constitutional guarantee of “open courts,” S.D. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:08 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
In a case of first impression, the South Dakota Supreme Court, in a 3–2 decision, ruled that the state’s physician–patient privilege does not protect third-parties’ medical records from disclosure so long as the parties redact all patient-identifying information. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
In a case of first impression, the South Dakota Supreme Court, in a 3–2 decision, ruled that the state’s physician–patient privilege does not protect third-parties’ medical records from disclosure so long as the parties redact all patient-identifying information. [read post]
