Search for: "Continental Casualty Company/CNA" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2008, 7:33 pm
Next, the subsidiary of CNA Financial, Inc. which underwrote structured settlement annuities through 2004, was Continental Assurance Company. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
  In the Pavlov case, the plaintiffs there argued that Continental Casualty Co., the underwriter for CNA, refused to pay long-term health insurance claims because policyholders were being treated in facilities outside the insurance contract. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
Willis Limited et al According to its 8-K filing,  Willis Limited, a subsidiary of  WIllis Group Holdings Limited, acknowledged that it settled "the placement of personal accident reinsurance in London and elsewhere" with CNA Financial Corporation and Continental Casualty Company ("CCC") for a total sum of $130 million. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
In the suit, Marie Miller and her company, Century 21/Marie Miller & Associates, argued that Continental Casualty (also known as CNA) should have settled the defamation case prior to trial, and that news of the verdict had harmed its business. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
  Despite the fact that the insured had earlier settled similar claims against Continental Casualty for a payment of $165,964, the court refused to order that Acuity receive an off-set for this payment due to factual questions with respect to what CNA had paid for and why. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
For that matter, plaintiffs’ logic would divine a horizontal agreement from virtually any parallel expenditures for marketing services, on the mistaken ground that a firm would not pay for advertising, for example, in the absence of an agreement with its competitors to enter into similar contracts with the advertising company. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm by Mike Aylward
”  Finally, despite the fact that the insured had earlier settled similar claims against Continental Casualty for a payment of $165,964, the court refused to order that Acuity receive an off-set for this payment due to factual questions with respect to what CNA had paid for and why. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
"The insurance company bears the burden of establishing that the exclusions apply in a particular case and they are subject to no other reasonable interpretation" (MDW Enters. v CNA Ins. [read post]