Search for: "Costa Crociere S.p.A." Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 7:30 am by CivPro Blogger
Costa Crociere, S.p.A., No. 09-337, a case involving the relation-back provision of FRCP 15(c)(1). [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:47 am by Jim Walker
Carnival Corp., Carnival PLC, Costa Crociere, S.p.A., Costa Cruise Lines, Inc., and Joseph Farcus Architect, P. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:28 am by Kevin Russell
,” which is actually just the sales and marketing agent for the cruise line, a separate (although related) entity whose official name is “Costa Crociere S.p.A. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:23 am by Jim Walker
Officer Gaspari’s Linkin page shows that he has worked for a total of four and one-half years for Costa Crociere S.p.A., first as a deck cadet for two years and as a third officer for the last two and one-half years. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:27 am by South Florida Lawyers
Costa Crociere, S.P.A., 289 F.3d 1300, 1303 (11th Cir. 2002) ("[F]ederal courts, in the forum non conveniens context, do not focus on the connection between the case and a particular state, but rather on the connection of the case to the United States as a whole. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:35 pm by Jeff Vail
Costa Crociere, S.p.A. (--- U.S. ----, decided June 7, 2010), holding that relation back turns on what the party to be added knew or should have known, not on the amending party's knowledge or timeliness in seeking amendment.- Rule 15(a) of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a party may amend its pleadings by leave of court and that such “leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Sanctions -- Maintenance of indefensible position in trial court and on appeal -- Rare circumstance in which appellee may be sanctioned -- Appellee complying with none of court deadlines -- Appellee directed to show cause why appellant's attorney's fees should not be assessed against appellee HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Appellant, vs. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Ideologues on both the left and right, as well as the public generally, frequently repeat their own received wisdoms that the Supreme Court is an easily categorized institution and that the Justices are committedly “liberal” or “conservative,” with Justice Kennedy as the lone swing vote. [read post]