Search for: "Cottonwood Environmental Law Center"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 9:04 am
<> Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am
Here are the materials in Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:36 pm
The dispute in Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 8:23 pm
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center 15-1387 Issue: (1) Whether respondent has Article III standing to challenge the Forest Service’s failure to reinitiate Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation on the Lynx Amendments, which were completed in 2007, after the Fish and Wildlife Service designated additional critical habitat for the lynx in 2009, when respondent cannot identify any member who has or will suffer a concrete injury as a… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:01 pm
” Federal law prevents the transportation across state lines of raw milk and most raw milk products. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 9:12 am
In New Mexico, he pointed to the costs of inaction in terms of dying cottonwoods and extreme heat.Sen. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Cottonwod Environmental Law Center, 15-1387, in which the plucky Cottonwood Environmental Law Center (official motto: Hosin’ ‘em in Bozeman) and its formidable friends deep-sixed Uncle Sam’s attempt to seek cert on (among other things) whether Cottonwood had standing to challenge the Forest Service’s actions in designating an endangered lynx’s critical habitat. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center 15-1387Issue: (1) Whether the respondent has Article III standing to challenge the Forest Service's failure to reinitiate Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act consultation on the Lynx Amendments, which were completed in 2007, after the Fish and Wildlife Service designated additional critical habitat for the lynx in 2009, when the respondent cannot identify any member who has or will suffer a concrete injury as a result;… [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Observing that the law does not require the state to prove that the accused had (or intended to have) contact with a minor, or that the accused accessed a website with any illicit or improper purpose, Packingham asks whether, “under th[e] Court’s First Amendment precedents, such a law is permissible. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
“[e]very new hiking path, ranger station, or ‘Keep Off the Grass’ sign in every National Park could deny access to land or ‘physically destroy the environmental conditions and the privacy’ necessary to some religious practices. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Like other digital providers, it is not bound by the Communications Act of 1934, a law that requires broadcast television networks to provide politicians equal access to the airwaves. [read post]
