Search for: "Cox Communications Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
A former Cox Communications Inc. employee pleaded guilty to charges he hacked into the company's computer system and disrupted computer and telecom services in four cities. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:00 am by Ben
” BMG and Round Hill claimed that Rightscorp Inc had informed Cox  of “hundreds” of repeat infringers. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm by Mark Brennan
On November 5, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission Enforcement Bureau announced a $595,000 settlement agreement with Cox Communications, Inc. to resolve an investigation into whether the company failed to properly protect its customers’ personal information when electronic data systems were breached in August 2014. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Second, the court says the willful blindness instruction was also broad: [s]ince we have held that contributory infringement requires knowledge of, or willful blindness to, specific instances of infringement, the court’s willful blindness instruction should similarly require a conclusion that Cox consciously avoid learning about specific instances of infringement, not merely that Cox avoided confirming the fact that ‘Cox users were infringing on… [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 8:59 am
" From the article: "The Old Lyme, Connecticut-based company said it sued Time Warner Inc., Cox Communications Inc., Charter Communications Inc., and Comcast Corp., alleging the cable operators violated its patent with their video-on-demand services offered to subscribers. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:56 am
The SEC settled a civil enforcement action with Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., over options backdating by the company's CEO, Gregory Reyes. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 9:41 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Demonstrating its continued commitment to data security enforcement, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced Cox Communications Inc., the nation’s third largest cable operator, agreed to pay $595,000 to resolve an investigation into whether the company failed to properly protect its customers’ personal information. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:24 pm by Pamela Wolf
The suit, filed in the Northern District of California, names T-Mobile US, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Cox Communications and Media Group, LLC, and similarly situated others. [read post]