Search for: "Cox v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2011, 4:13 am by Gregory Dell
In Sandra Rada v Cox Enterprises Inc as Plan Administrator & AETNA Life Insurance Company as Claims Administrator, the plaintiff Sandra Rada alleged that AETNA Life had not provided the plaintiff with a full and fair review of her claim for long term disability (LTD) benefits and thus seek the Court to review Aetna Life's decision under a de novo standard. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
  Kyle Langvardt suggested how the First Amendment should apply to content moderation laws for social media platforms in the first piece of Lawfare’s new paper series titled “The Digital Social Contract. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Christopher Cox in a letter dated Aug. 13, 1999, that the Defense Department would comply (though he also cautioned that such a requirement might be inconsistent with existing law regarding civil liberties protections for U.S. persons). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
On January 17, 2007, the Government also checked Nevada Department of Motor Vehicle records which revealed a current driver's license for Luana Carter, with the same social security number, date of birth and physical address obtained through LexisNexis. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
  Social Security and Medicare BenefitsII. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Social Security Administration, 796 F.2d 576, 580 (1st Cir. 1986). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
(See this analysis by Juliette Kayyem, former assistant secretary of homeland security in the Obama administration). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
 Thus, in Cox v Turkey  (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
The DACA Program  DACA has two elements, as Chief Justice John Roberts explained in his opinion for the Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Thus, in Cox v Turkey (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]