Search for: "Cupp, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
Cupp Jr. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 2:53 pm
CUPP Computing AS, No. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:38 pm
Cupp, John W. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 7:03 pm
The patentee (CUPP) filed the appeal after the PTAB issued its final written IPR decisions finding the claims of three mobile device cybersecurity patents to be unpatentably obvious. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in CUPP Computing AS v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in CUPP Computing AS v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Cupp, the Court affirmed a ruling by the 10th District Court of Appeals that a Franklin County township was immune from possible liability when one of its officers was involved in a traffic accident outside of the township’s boundaries while the officer was responding to a general call for assistance from a county sheriff’s deputy. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:47 am
Cupp, J.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Court of Appeal noted that it had previously rejected that reasoning in Kenly v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 9:11 am
That decision can be appeals to the courts of appeals and then, perhaps, to the Ohio Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:10 pm
Court of Appeals is one of five finalists for the Pepperdine Law School deanship. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 2:43 pm
When the Ohio Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal in Allen v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:38 pm
Justice Robert Cupp, who previously served on the 3rd Ohio District Court of Appeals in Lima, recused himself from the case on Monday. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:17 am
Carol Cupp (NFP) In the Matter of D.J. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:03 pm
Cupp Jr., a law professor who has written extensively on this topic. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
The verdict was reduced on appeal to $82 million and the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am
The purpose of the rule, Cupp’s opinion for the majority holds, is to make the conviction final for purposes of appeal, so substantively all that is required is the fact of conviction. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
On to the courts of appeals… Criminal. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:52 am
In the courts of appeals… Criminal. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. [read post]
