Search for: "Curtis v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2008, 7:59 pm
Oral Argument in case: 07-2423; USA v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 12:42 pm
Oral Argument in case: ; USA v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:49 am
Oral Argument in case# 10-2450; USA v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:36 pm
Diamond P.C. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
Manual Workers Paid Less Than Minimum WageIn early October, a proposed class action was filed in Brooklyn federal court by Jacori Curtis, an employee of an Emirates Airline affiliate -- DNATA Aviation USA, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:04 am
More support for this argument from yesterday's opinion in USA v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 6:08 am
CA6 Home PUBLISHED OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0143p.062008/04/07 USA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:45 pm
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:32 am
0377 (DDB) Marsh USA Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:19 am
Philip Morris," published in May, Eric Buhr and Kasey Curtis analyze the California Supreme Court's May 5th decision in Pooshs v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
0377 (DDB) Marsh USA Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a pair of cases, Nestlé USA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
On Dec. 1, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 11:16 am
Curtis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
Yes, in Illinois In People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:27 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court opinion in Allaithi v. [read post]
