Search for: "D Wilkins" Results 1 - 20 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2011, 9:58 am by Zoe Tillman
Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), who recommended Wilkins for the position, said yesterday that Wilkins had left a “lasting impression” on her when he was being considered. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:34 am
DICEY BUSINESS They'd meet at least one a week in a vacant Federal Building grand jury room that now, ironically, is part of his office. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:34 am by admissions
Professor Wilkins poses as the Discobolus sculpture in front of Hemenway Gym. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:11 am by Mary Minow
Wilkin: Exactly, and the Copyright Evidence Registry was intended to be that.Minow: Is there anything you'd like to add? [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:08 pm by Garrett West
Howard University, the panel (Wilkins, Katsas, Rogers) held that the same three-year statute of limitations that applies (at least in the District of Columbia) to civil rights claims under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act also applies to civil rights claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:27 am
Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins wrote, adding that “no extraordinary circumstance beyond his control” prevented Young from filing his petition within 60 days in the proper court.Meanwhile, back home in California, for an unpub'd decision on appealability and appellate standing, from 1/4, read this one. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:16 pm
Within 15 minutes he'd found a match that led to an arrest and conviction, reports the Tacoma News Tribune. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:59 pm
  And expressly explain that I'd come out the same way even if the California Supreme Court decides to abandon the substantial evidence test and to say that the Court of Appeal has to review for clear and convincing evidence (just like the trial court). [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 7:44 pm by The Blog Team
A unanimous panel decision (Judges Srinivasan, Wilkins & Sentelle) held that such a claim may be raised—at least where the defendant executed a “generic” waiver that didn’t preclude a later-asserted claim of ineffectiveness. [read post]