Search for: "DAL-TILE"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
Dal-Tile Corp., serves as a reminder that employers can potentially be held liable not only for sexual or other harassment perpetrated by their own employees, but also for harassment carried out by third parties, such as employees of customers, vendors or other business associates. [read post]
7 May 2014, 11:00 pm
Dal-Tile Corp., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that an employer can be liable under a "negligence standard" for harassment attributable to non-employee visitors, meaning that the employer will be liable if it knew or should have known of the harassment. [read post]
7 May 2014, 11:00 pm
Dal-Tile Corp., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that an employer can be liable under a "negligence standard" for harassment attributable to non-employee visitors, meaning that the employer will be liable if it knew or should have known of the harassment. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:24 am
Dal-Tile Corporation on April 29, 2014. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:47 am
Dal-Tile Corp., No. 5:10-CV-00522, 2012 U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:47 am
Dal-Tile Corp., No. 5:10-CV-00522, 2012 U.S. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:57 am
Dal-Tile Corporation. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:14 pm
In that case, the Circuit overturned a trial court judgment for the employer, finding that there was sufficient evidence to go to trial on the employee's complaints that an asshole customer had created a hostile environment and the employer didn't do anything about it: Applying this standard here, we conclude that a reasonable jury could find that Dal–Tile knew or should have known of the harassment. [read post]
