Search for: "DEF LANDLORD" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2007, 7:30 am
  CCP 1942 tenant v. landlord action. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
And then, in Coventry 2 Landlord liability for tenant nuisance. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:20 pm
The court concluded in the Walker that it would: "def[y] logic and common sense to argue that these incidents are not sufficient, as a matter of law, to attract the landlord's attention to the dangerous conditions here. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:46 pm
Get some noise cancelling headphones and be glad that the noise is not caused by a stereo with extra high def base on and surround sound speakers placed on a hardwood, laminate or tile floor. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:14 am by Richard Hunt
The vocabulary matters because under the FHA a “modification” is a change to a physical feature that the tenant must pay for while an “accommodation” is a change in policy that the landlord must pay for on the theory that the costs will usually be nominal. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:46 am by Richard Hunt
Agencies, landlords and others who want to stay out of court should think of the accommodation process as a shared effort to solve a problem, not an adversary proceeding to be won or lost. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/CASTLETON-BK-SD-IN-LORCH-9-30-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Absent exigent circumstances, stay imposed per Ch 15 is coterminous w/stay in corresponding foreign proceeding. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/DAEWOO-BK-SD-NY-LIFLAND-10-5-11.pdf … B-IA dismisses §548(a)(1)(B) cplt under Twiqbal based on failure to adequate plead insolvency, even if FRCP 9 inapplic.… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Click Here DECISIONS Boston Landlord Faces Nearly $85K Penalty for Failure to Disclose Lead Paint to Tenants. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
  Adirondack insured the unit owner.Adirondack denied liability coverage to its insured because, as she had moved out of and no longer resided in the unit prior to the loss, the premises did not meet the policy's definition of "residence premises" (defined as "the unit where you reside as shown as the `residence premises' in the Declarations").In granting Adirondack's cross motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint, Supreme Court agreed that the… [read post]