Search for: "DIRECTV Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2008, 12:46 am
Patent infringement litigation commenced against The DIRECTV Group, Inc. in Los Angeles District Court on February 14, 2008. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm by Associated Press
The Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday that its complaint charges DirecTV Inc. with deceptively advertising a discounted 12-month programming package. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:48 pm
DirecTV, Inc., 2007 WL 1138879 (S.D.N.Y.)Time Warner sued DirecTV for false advertising under state and federal law. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 1:21 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that it reached a settlement that will prohibit DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC (“DirecTV”) and its parent corporation, AT&T Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
DirecTV, Inc., -- F.Supp.2d --, 2007 WL 412498 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:37 am
Santa Ana, CA - Quest Software, Inc. sued DIRECTV Operations, LLC for copyright infringement and breach of software license agreement. [read post]
The appeal stemmed from a case where the plaintiffs, Ninth Inning Inc., “challenged the National Football League’s contract with DirecTV for the television rights to out-of-market games. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:16 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-3 Monday in DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
DirecTV, Inc., 611 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2010), calling the decision "misguided in both the reasoning and result. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:11 am
Evansville, IN - Copyright lawyers for DIRECTV of California filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Kevan Tally and Michael Schnell, owners of McGahery Enterprises, Inc., which operates the Corner Bar & Grill in Evansville, Indiana infringed copyrighted NFL games by illegal intercepted and unencrypted satellite signals. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:50 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
DirecTV, Inc., the Eleventh Circuit case in which the panel interpreted the Class Action Fairness Act as not eliminating the requirement that at least one plaintiff have a claim of more than $75,000. [read post]