Search for: "DOES 1 through X" Results 1 - 20 of 2,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 8:05 am by Staff Writer
The term “Class X felony” may raise questions for some, as it does not seem to cleanly fit into the scheme of Illinois felony classifications. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:41 pm by Tung Yin
(3) Along those lines, why does the coin kill Shaw when bullets don't? [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 9:50 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:54 pm by Adam Schwartz
The company collects our location data through software development kits (SDKs) incorporated into third-party apps, through the company’s own apps, and through buying data from other brokers. [read post]
1 May 2017, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“[A] claim that the ‘test proves x’ is literally false only if the test does not (reliably) prove x. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:49 pm
Linda X., M.D., Linda X., M.D., Inc., General Medical Center, a Corporation, and Does 1 through 250, inclusive, Defendants. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
If it does not float, it is worthwhile to have a discussion with X-ray experts, who might have local test facilities for further investigation. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by Michael Madison
What does it look like in practice? [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Under subsection (b)(2), X and Y are treated as A’s children for purposes of inheritance from and through A but not for purposes of inheritance from or through X or Y. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:01 am by Renae Lloyd
If you suffered investment losses in Noble Royalty Access Fund X LP or another Noble Investment product, please contact The White Law Group at 1-888-637-5510 for a free consultation. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:10 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
In accordance with paragraphs (a)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, each of the transactions in years 1 through 4 is a reportable transaction with respect to X. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 1:00 pm by Kevin Goldberg
For example, while satellite carriers bear much the same resemblance to cable systems as FilmOn X does, Congress created a distinct license for satellite folks. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:25 pm by danielabasolo
  If they do not give timely notice that period is set from 7/1-7/31. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:51 am by Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
The X-UIDH header effectively reinvents the cookie, but does so in a way that is shockingly insecure and dangerous to your privacy. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
App’x 348, 352 (applying the same specifically to inherency). [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:27 am by Eleonora Rosati
At a time when physical proximity is strongly discouraged or prohibited tout court through various measures – ranging from ‘social distancing’ to ‘self-isolation’, from ‘quarantine’ up to strictly enforced ‘lockdowns’ – people have been discovering new or enhancing further the ways through which they connect at a distance, including online. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:32 am by davidzhawk
And if I have a 20% CTR in position #1 and you have a 2% CTR in position #2, this does not necessarily mean that you will show up ahead of me, because Google might extrapolate that my projected CTR at position #1 might in fact be 22%, so given the same bid and QS, I could still out-place you. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm by A. Lahser, Patent Attorney
Does the inclusion of Z in claim 1, especially following the word ‘and’, prevent me from saying that Z is Y in the dependent claim 2? [read post]