Search for: "DOES 1 to 20, inclusive" Results 1 - 20 of 1,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2019, 8:39 pm by Gene Takagi
Resources What are we talking about when we say diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and why does DEI matter? [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
And, in its latest authoritative rendering, appears in the form of a draft General Assembly Resolution: Promotion of inclusive and effective international tax cooperation at the United Nations A/C.2/78/L.18/Rev.1 (15 November 2023) approved by the UN Second COmmittee at its 78th Session: By that text, titled “Promotion of inclusive and effective international tax cooperation at the United Nations” (document A/C.2/78/L.18/Rev.1), the Assembly would… [read post]
As Subsection 15(2.6) cancels the subsection 15(2) inclusion, section 80.4 may still apply to the Shareholder Loan for the period during which it is outstanding, whereas a paragraph 20(1)(j) does not cancel out the original income inclusion, meaning that section 80.4 will not apply. [read post]
25 May 2014, 10:36 am by Judy Wolf
First things first: Option 1, bankruptcy does not allow the inclusion of Federal student loan debt (or child support or taxes). [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:43 pm by Rob Robinson
Operational Efficiency has consistently been named the #1 challenge in previous Aderant surveys. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:43 pm by David Jacobson
The date for inclusion of standard wording in contracts for repair has been extended to 1 July 2011. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:56 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
However, the budget does not provide additional details. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Private sector and non-profit organizations with 20-49 employees no longer need to document policies (does not remove compliance or reporting requirements). [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:55 am
Inclusion on the list does not mean the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:22 am by Toni Guarino
(AMEX: APP) who’s purchased stock during the “class period” of December 20, 2006 and August 17, 2010 inclusive, then you might still be able to participate in the action. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 7:19 am by Scott H. Kimpel
A registrant that is a “smaller reporting company,” or that is neither a “large accelerated filer” nor an “accelerated filer,” and that currently submits filings in ASCII format, does not need to comply with the new rules until September 1, 2018. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 7:19 am by Scott H. Kimpel
A registrant that is a “smaller reporting company,” or that is neither a “large accelerated filer” nor an “accelerated filer,” and that currently submits filings in ASCII format, does not need to comply with the new rules until September 1, 2018. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the main request on file read:1. [read post]