Search for: "DOES 1-101"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2015, 4:48 am
Doe's Impact on the Constitutionality of Long-Term Suspensions and Expulsions, 101 Va. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
ABSTRACT: Contrary to the most criminal or quasi-criminal regimes,1 Art 101 TFEU does neither explicitly recognise the status of an instigator, accomplice, or a facilitator—as opposed to a perpetrator—nor does... [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:30 pm
Section 16-101, et seq., the Trustees of the Office of the Public Defender of Maryland announce that the six-year term of the incumbent Public Defender will conclude on June 1, 2016. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 10:31 am
§ 101. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 3:24 pm
If the spouse does confiscate the card, he or she can face larceny charges. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:41 am
However, that does not convert a mechanical/electronic device into an abstract idea (...) [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:44 pm
NOTE: This article was updated to account for Public Act 101-652, which takes effect on January 1, 2023. [read post]
6 May 2021, 7:15 am
” Now, Fast 101 has petitioned to the Supreme Court with two questions: 1. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
., Plaintiff,v.DOES 1–101, Defendants.No. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:48 am
No invention:Turning to the second step [of Alice], we find claim 1 does not contain an inventive concept sufficient to “‘transform the nature of the claim’ into a patent-eligible application. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
So, if a specification does not confidently emphasize the “invention,” its “benefits over” conventional prior art, and “disparage” the prior art, will examiners and judges continue Step 1... [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:15 pm
If the Supreme Court does not take this case, it is unlikely to reconsider its decisions on Section 101 of the U.S. patent law. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:15 am
Does 1-101, No. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 11:33 pm
Divorce and Custody 101? [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:09 pm
The questions in this case were (1) whether an attorney, who provides bankruptcy assistance to an assisted person in return for consideration and who does not fall within one of the five exceptions, is a "debt relief agency" for the purposes of 11 U.S.C. 101(12A); (2) whether 11 U.S.C. 526(a)(4) violates the First Amendment; and (3) whether 11 U.S.C. 528(a) and (b)(2) violate the First Amendment. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:16 pm
Groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant discovery does not by itself satisfy the §101 inquiry. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
U.S., 2011 WL 4536526, 1 (2011). [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
A reasonable interpretation of claims 16 and 36 consistent with Appellants’ Specification is that the claims recite no more than software per se which does not fall within one of the four categories of subject matter that are eligible for patent protection under § 101: (1) processes; (2) machines; (3) manufactures; and (4) compositions of matter. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:18 am
The statutory provision, however, does not proscribe actions that we may take. . . . [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
The rejections of claims 1, 84-87, 89-94, 96-99, 101, 107, 108, 112,and 115-118 are affirmed.KSR was cited as to claim 1:The selection of an appropriate depth of field for the Campbell endoscope from a range known in the art amounts to no more than the implementation of a known feature with a predictable result, which bars patentability. [read post]
