Search for: "DOES 1-116" Results 1 - 20 of 1,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In support of its request for referral the appellant argued that the holding of oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference was not compatible with Articles 116 and 113(1) EPC.The appellant raised the general point of law of whether conducting oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference was compatible with Article 116(1) EPC. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:31 am by John Wright
NEVADA SUPREME COURT FINDS THAT NRS 116 DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH MORTGAGES INSURED BY THE FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION (FHA) We previously reported on the recent July 27, 2017, recent decision from the Nevada Supreme Court where the Court held the legal reasoning in SFR Investments applies retroactively to all foreclosures since NRS 116’s inception. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:31 am by John Wright
NEVADA SUPREME COURT FINDS THAT NRS 116 DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH MORTGAGES INSURED BY THE FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION (FHA) We previously reported on the recent July 27, 2017, recent decision from the Nevada Supreme Court where the Court held the legal reasoning in SFR Investments applies retroactively to all foreclosures since NRS 116’s inception. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 11:01 am by oliver randl
This is a violation of the inalienable right to OPs enshrined in A 116(1). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this decision the Board had to delve into interpretative questions.Claim 1 of the main request on file read:A hermetically sealed, molded thermoplastic dispensing container which comprises:a nozzle (16, 116, 216) unitary with the container (10, 110, 210) and defining a dispensing aperture (18);a removable closure unitary with the nozzle (16, 116, 216) and occluding the aperture (18);said nozzle (16, 116, 216) being adapted to receive the hub (36) of a… [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:23 am by Jeff Gittins
Curtis Bramble (R-Provo) are running identical bills with House Bill 218 and Senate Bill 116. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The fact that s. 14(1)(b) of the Code does not require intent by the publisher or proof of harm, or provide for any defences does not make it overbroad.... [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:00 am by Unknown
It does not yield simple policy prescriptions, but it does offer an analytical lens that complements others, such as the need to explicitly consider the gendered nature of—and responses to—each of these phenomena, as well as the need to foreground environmental concerns. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 8:18 am by Roel van Woudenberg
 The Board holds oral proceedings if it considers these to be expedient or if they are requested by any party to the proceedings (Article 116(1) EPC).7. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Unlike some national legal systems, the EPC does not stipulate explicitly the form(s) in which oral proceedings under Article 116 EPC shall take place. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Accordingly, A 116(1) foresees that OPs shall take place not only at the request of a party but also at the instance of the EPO if it considers this to be expedient. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 11:25 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
They also argued that the public domain is protected by article 1 of Directive 2006/116/EC on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights, which states that a literary or artistic work revert to the public domain 70 years after the death of the author, irrespective of the date when the work is lawfully made available to the public. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In view of the wording of A 116 the ED has no margin of discretion at all. [read post]