Search for: "DOES 1-44" Results 1 - 20 of 4,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by dawn
September 26, 2016 01:50 PM | Permalink | For Immediate Release: Monday, September 26, 2016Plan cuts taxes for every income group on average, but some low-income families would see tax increasesA new distributional analysis of Donald Trump’s tax plan reveals that 44 percent of the candidate’s proposed tax cuts would go to the top 1 percent of taxpayers, and the plan would increase the… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:02 am by Matthias Weller
On 3 March 2015, Advocate General Szpunar delivered its opinion in the case C-681/13 (Diago Brands BV) concerning the interpretation of Art. 34 para. 1 of Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 (former Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012), in a case where recognition of a judgment of one Member State is sought in another Member State. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 8:06 pm
What does it take to get a Filing Date? [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:31 am
Both the First and Second Departments have previously held that CPL 440.30(1-a) does not permit defendants who have pleaded guilty to seek such DNA testing of forensic evidence (People v Lebron, 44 AD3d 310 [2007]; People v Byrdsong, 33 AD3d 175 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:34 am by Liz Dunshee
Does your company allow insiders to voluntarily terminate a Rule 10b5-1 plan? [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:25 am
I've been on hold with American Airlines for 1 hour and 11 minutes.....ADDED: 1 hour and 44 minutes.... [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:17 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
No less than 44 amicus curiae briefs were filed with the Enlarged Board of Appeal in case G 1/21, where the crucial referral question will be answered: “Is the conduct of oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference compatible with the right to oral proceedings as enshrined in Article 116(1) EPC if not all of the parties to the proceedings have given their consent to the conduct of oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference? [read post]
23 May 2014, 8:04 am by Docket Navigator
The Board allowed 18 of 19 substitute claims and cancelled the original claims 1-26. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Kellogg North America Co., 869 F.3d 1336, 1343–44, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
Bruce MacDougall (UBC Faculty of Law) has posted The Direct Voice in Legal Discussions on Equality: An Essay (University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 181-204, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:34 am by Matthias Weller
(…) on the basis of Article 16(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 a consumer cannot invoke, at the same time as his own claims, claims on the same subject assigned by other consumers domiciled in other places of the same Member State, in other Member States or in non-member States. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 4:42 am
Knight, Striking the Balance between Anti-Discrimination Laws and First Amendment Freedoms: An Alternative Proposal to Preserve Diversity, (Aug. 1, 2007).From Bepress:Asher Maoz, Religious Education in Israel, (Tel Aviv University Legal Working Paper Series, No.44, July 2007).Multi-article issues:From the State House to the Schoolhouse: Religious Expression in the Public Sphere, articles by Cynthia A. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:30 am by Nicole Vinson
A policyholder who is asked to submit to an examination under oath (EUO) usually does not know exactly what an examination under oath entails. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
Thanks to our friend Andy Linneman, we learn that:■ More than 30 million Americans between the ages of 21 and 64 are disabled■ 44% of employees say they have about a 1% chance of becoming disabled during their working years.■ 60% of consumers are concerned about their ability to support themselves if they were to become disabled and unable to workI just met with a client who, as the result of a recent stroke, has lost 95% of her hearing. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
House of Representatives by a vote of 377-44 adopted House Resolution 883 (full text) stating that the slogan, "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free'" is antisemitic. [read post]