Search for: "DOES I-XX"
Results 1 - 20
of 399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
XX exception in TBT, I have long wondered how to read TBT 2.1 (national treatment) with TBT 2.2 (necessity) (see my case book with A. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
Here's what I said on this blog about the AB's findings in that case right after the report came out: What does this mean for GATT Article XX as a defense to claims under other WTO agreements? [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 7:28 am
Instead, I read them as saying, basically, that the TBT Agreement does not have an equivalent to Article XX. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:24 am
If one part of the measure is discriminatory, and violates the rules (including the chapeau), what difference does it make if the broader measure meets one of the Article XX objectives? [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 6:22 am
APPEAL OF THE PANEL'S FINDING THAT CHINA DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO INVOKE ARTICLE XX OF THE GATT 1994 IN DEFENSE OF A CLAIM UNDER PARAGRAPH 11.3 OF CHINA'S ACCESSION PROTOCOL 9. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:38 pm
Article XX(g) might also work, but I'm a little less sure about this one. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:15 am
I would be much obliged if you could share. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
What does this mean for GATT Article XX as a defense to claims under other WTO agreements? [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:33 am
By contrast, take a look at what the TPP TBT chapter does with this issue. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:47 am
A lot of the discussion on the Seal Products case in previous posts highlights the difficulty of reconciling the various WTO non-discrimination obligations: GATT Articles I:1 and III:4; GATT Article III:4 and TBT 2.1; the GATT Article XX chapeau and TBT 2.1; etc. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:11 pm
In this case, Article XX was invoked to justify an Article XI violation, and the Panel skipped the examination of Articles I and III claims on the ground of judicial economy. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 7:55 pm
I believe the most significant contribution of the Panel decision is the new ground it developed for interpreting the chapeau of GATT Article XX. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:14 am
" However, this appeal is a "conditional" one, as the EC only asks the AB to address it if the AB does not find, as requested by the EC, that the Mercosur exemption leads to a finding that the ban is inconsistent with the chapeau of GATT Article XX. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:50 am
I just became aware of a new procedure to provide “an intent to separate a joint consolidation loan” when a client received this: As you are already aware, you and XX have a FFEL Joint Consolidation Loan. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:26 pm
It’s unfortunate what the game does to you. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 1:53 am
OHIM has made several attempts to adopt it, currently now amending a class XX heading on the applicant’s request to the totality of the wording of the class XX heading and the class XX alphabetical list, with no apparent concern on broadening. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:51 am
How does it turn out, after a scientific analysis possible only in the late twentieth century, that the stains on both cloths lack a key genetic identifier for maleness? [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:58 am
XX (d) may have potential along similar lines. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 5:28 am
" It does use the phrase for which TERF is an acronym: "trans-exclusionary radical feminist. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:12 am
In order to maintain the intended tariff treatment for certain products covered in Schedule XX, I have determined that technical corrections to the HTS are necessary. 13. [read post]
