Search for: "DORMAN PRODUCTS, INC." Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 6:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dorman Products, Inc., 2010 WL 3855221 (E.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Kyle Fleming
Metal Lite, Inc., 159 F.3d 1337, 1340 (Fed. [read post]
4 May 2009, 12:12 am
In a similar matter involving a bogus weight-loss product and a continuity program, in December 2008 Ultralife Fitness, Inc., Tru Genix, LLC, Neil P. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 7:09 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Laurie Posner (PNC Capital Advisors) 10:00 – 10:30 – Coffee Break (Sponsored by Firm 58) 10:30 – 11:00 – Manager Selection and Portfolio Creation at a Fund of Funds (Sponsored by Ruddy Law Office, PLLC) Speaker To Be Confirmed (The Kenmar Group) 11:00 – 12:00 – Innovations in Investment Products and Marketing Exchange Traded Funds (Sponsored by Michael Coglianese CPA, PC) Tim Pickering (Auspice Capital Advisors Ltd) 11:00 – 12:00 –… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Pergo, Inc (not precedential) (Gray on Claims) CAFC to look at admissibility of new evidence for BPAI appeals: Hyatt v Kappos (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Infringement finding in Smith & Nephew patent case: Smith & Nephew v Arthrex (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Dorman ProductsDorman appeals from preliminary injunction order stopping… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Pergo, Inc (not precedential) (Gray on Claims) CAFC to look at admissibility of new evidence for BPAI appeals: Hyatt v Kappos (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Infringement finding in Smith & Nephew patent case: Smith & Nephew v Arthrex (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Dorman ProductsDorman appeals from preliminary injunction order stopping… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance)   Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Open licensing vs monopoly controlled supply: (KEI), Protecting inventions involving biofuel feedstock: (IP Law360), Brazil: ‘Public interest’ factor in Brazil’s patenting system: (Spicy IP), EU: Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 on advanced medicinal products to enter into force soon, creating certification procedure regarding quality and non-clinical data: (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scholastic Inc., 259 F3d at 86 [objective of the partnership was the "'development, packaging, production and distribution of theatrical feature films . . . while also involved . . . in television development and production'"]; Sanley Co. v Louis (197 AD2d 412, 413 [1st Dept 1993] [partnership's purpose was to acquire, manage and resell real estate]). [read post]