Search for: "Dai Hing, 68, Inc." Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Kartanson, 720 S.W.2d 65, 68 (Tenn.Ct.App.1986); Roberts v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Kartanson, 720 S.W.2d 65, 68 (Tenn.Ct.App.1986); Roberts v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]