Search for: "Daniel Anita"
Results 1 - 20
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 6:39 am
From a news release:INDIANAPOLIS (December 16, 2011) – Governor Mitch Daniels announced today that Anita Kolkmeier Samuel, assistant general counsel... [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
-V- DANIELS, MITCHELL E. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Daniel Sokol Anita Banicevic & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP)explore Collective Dominance In Canada: A New Direction. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 1:25 am
Daniel Sokol George Addy, Anita Banicevic, & Mark Katz (all of Davis Ward Phillips & Vineberg) provide their thoughts on Antitrust Legislation and Policy in a Global Economic Crisisâ€â [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Daniel Sokol Anita Banicevic & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP)explore Collective Dominance In Canada: A New Direction. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:00 am
Anita Mukherjee (Wisconsin School of Business), Daniel W. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:37 am
Reporting on yesterday's Court of Appeals decision in Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 9:03 am
Updating yesterday's ILB entry on the possible impact of the July 16th Indiana COA decision in Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:33 am
The July 16th Indiana COA decision in Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:24 am
Attorney's Office Southern District of Texas on July 11, 2011 released the following: "HOUSTON - A Houston grand jury has indicted Ronald and Anita Witt for conspiracy and embezzlement of funds from Local 450 of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Local 450's apprenticeship school, United States Attorney José Angel Moreno announced today along with Roger Hilburn, regional director, Employee Benefits Security Administration, and Daniel B. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:24 am
Attorney's Office Southern District of Texas on July 11, 2011 released the following: "HOUSTON - A Houston grand jury has indicted Ronald and Anita Witt for conspiracy and embezzlement of funds from Local 450 of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Local 450's apprenticeship school, United States Attorney José Angel Moreno announced today along with Roger Hilburn, regional director, Employee Benefits Security Administration, and Daniel B. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 7:00 am
Here’s the Monday morning read: Anita Hill Saw History Repeat Itself at Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court Hearings (David Remnick, The New Yorker) A Bad Precedent on the High Court (Daniel Huff, The Wall Street Journal) When a Supreme Court Justice Probably Endorsed Perjury (Jamelle Bouie, The New York Times) How Ginni Thomas jockeyed for influence in Trump’s orbit (Marshall Cohen, Pamela Brown, & Gabby Orr, CNN) Thomas Poses With Senate Candidate Walker… [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:38 am
Mitchell Daniels, Jr., et al (see ILB entry here), the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette has an editorial today headed "FSSA's blunders. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:34 am
For publication opinions today (3): Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 6:29 pm
” CHAPTER 1: NOW Anita Hill Won, Even Though She Lost Lena Waithe Took the Emmy and Ran Gloria Steinem Had to Convince Her Male Editors That Women Want Power Dianne Feinstein, Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris, and Mazie Hirono Asked the Questions — Brett Kavanaugh Got Hysterical Opal Tometi, Patrisse Cullors, and Alicia Garza Are Taking Black Lives Matter to the Polls Brynn Tannehill Leads Better As a Woman Than She Did As a Man Stormy Daniels Didn’t Want to Be… [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
Mitch Daniels will appoint an interim judge to serve until the first general election that follows the appointment. [read post]
24 May 2008, 5:02 am
--Anita L. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
Anita Bowser, who died in office last week at age 86. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:22 am
Daniel Solove at Concurring Opinions agrees with the result but looks on the horizon: One of the potential problems with the court’s holding is that it may deter ISPs and other sites from having an explicit policy for removing tortious material. [read post]
