Search for: "Daubert LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 5:04 am
Gigs, LLC held a Daubert/Lanigan II hearing with regard to the admissibility or non admissibility of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:07 am
Schoenthal Family, LLC, _ F.3d _ (11th Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 8:42 am
” See JH Kelly, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:29 pm
Under Daubert v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Akzo Nobel Paints LLC, 2013 U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Air One MRO, LLC (S.D. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:01 am
Deflecto, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
ABERRANT DECISIONS The Daubert trilogy and the statutory revisions to Rule 702 have not brought universal enlightenment. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:51 am
(USA) LLC, No. 12-1750, 2014 U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:18 am
Troy-Bilt, LLC, the Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment on behalf of the defendant in a products liability case after the district court struck the plaintiff’s expert under Daubert. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
” The article indicated an investment group known as World Trade City Orangeburg, LLC, which has ties to China and the United States, plans to purchase 1,200 acres of farmland near Bowman, South Carolina, for an international trade center that could employ more than 1,000 people. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:04 am
” Food Lion, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:50 pm
Pro. 26, which is designed to foster Daubert scrutiny. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:57 am
Actavis Totowa, LLC et al., 2:08-cv-01282;• William J. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:40 am
The defendant filed a motion to exclude under Daubert, which was denied by the court. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 8:05 pm
Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC), 795 F. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:28 am
Green’s report does not meet the standards of reliability set forth in Daubert. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
”), citing Daubert v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:39 pm
The Marine Group, LLC et al – United States District Court – District of Oregon – October 13th, 2015 – In this environmental cleanup case, the testimony of insurance expert witnesses Robert Hughes and Dennis Connolly were challenged on grounds of inadmissible legal conclusions and qualifications. [read post]
