Search for: "David Brent Olson" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2011, 5:35 am by Jon Hyman
David Brent begot Michael Scott, his U.S. counterpart and the second most inappropriate boss ever. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm by Jon Levitan
Additional coverage comes from David Savage and Mark Z. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Olson, which upheld the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, and at the subsequently intertwined lives of Bill Clinton and Kenneth Starr. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm by Thomas Hopson
 Other early coverage comes from Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; Brent Kendall and Melanie Trottman of The Wall Street Journal (subscription required); Peter Moskowitz at Al Jazeera America; Steven Greenhouse for The New York Times; Ed Pilkington at the Guardian; Stephanie Simon at Politico; Krishnadev Calamur at NPR; Michael Pearson and Bill Mears at CNN; Jaclyn Belczyk at Jurist; Mark Walsh at Education Week; and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:49 am by Anne Reed
  I know I must be missing some people, and I'm sorry -- but I know I need to thank at least Robert Ambrogi, Judge Daniel Anderson, Barry Barnett, Emma Barton, Mark Bennett, Dan Berexa, Niki Black, Beth Bochnak, Ken Broda-Bahm, Michael Connelly, Judge John DiMotto, David Donoghue, Blawg Review's Ed., Carolyn Elefant, Dennis Elias, Karen Franklin, David Giacalone, Gideon, Melissa Gomez, Scott Greenfield, Grant Griffiths, Jon Groth, Stephen Gustitis, Rita… [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
Brent Kendall at the Wall Street Journal reported on the cert. grant in Williamson v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
At PatentlyO, Dennis Crouch discusses the ruling, as does Walter Olson at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
Back in 2011, at a Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference, Chief Justice John Roberts took a cheap shot at law professors and law reviews when he intoned: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]