Search for: "Davis v. Department of the Treasury"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
” 3 KENNETH DAVIS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE, § 20.04 at 74 (1958); accord, Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:55 pm
Treasury, and potential treble damages. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:05 pm
We expect more guidance from the Treasury Department and the IRS on this topic. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
The post Putin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm
Davis 21-109Issues: (1) Whether the States’ consent to suit in the bankruptcy courts, found to exist in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:52 am
In filings with the court Tuesday, government lawyers provided letters from officials in the Departments of State and Treasury that argued that sanctions that applied to Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin didn’t block payments to Energomash, since the US government hadn’t made an “affirmative determination” that Rogozin controlled, and profited from, Energomash. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
Michigan Department of the Treasury. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Department of the Treasury administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security.1 In the UK, HM Treasury is the responsible government department for the implementation and administration of international financial sanctions.2 Both departments have readily accessible lists of sanctions that are currently in operation. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:41 pm
Rick cites Davis v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
In accordance with Moodley v Department of National Treasury [2017] ZALAC 5; (2017) 38 ILJ 1098 (LAC), it is a failure not to take cognisance of section 193(2) and to consider whether reinstatement might be inappropriate. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
The state court's resolution of this claim represents an unreasonable application of Supreme Court Confrontation Clause jurisprudence, most notably Davis v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 10:17 am
Mishustin and Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
It turns out that there is one powerful agency of government that was designed to be independent of political interference and—unlike, say, the Justice Department—continues to be run competently and with a largely non-ideological agenda. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
Treasury Department, U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Winn (2004) -- Tax Injunction ActAlaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
Davis opinion must be in place to be effective for the August 2008 payroll. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am
In Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]