Search for: "Davison v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a well reasoned opinion in Davison v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:08 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Modaresi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1359 (23 November 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Davison v Habeeb & Ors [2011] EWHC 3031 (QB) (25 November 2011) Eden v Rubin [2011] EWHC 3090 (QB) (24 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC B1 (Admin) (17 November 2011) J, R (on the… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:46 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued August 25, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Davison v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 11:52 pm by admin
Harley-Davison is recalling a total of 308,000 motorcycles with approximately 250,000 units affected in the United States due to a brake issue. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
This question was addressed in the case of Davison v Habeeb ([2011] EWHC 3031 (QB)) handed down on 25 November 2011 by HHJ Parkes QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
”  The Court agreed with Judge Davison’s recommendation that the Court disallow compensation for fees associated with collateral state proceedings and reduce all unclear or comingled time entries by 50%, arguing that those hours were necessarily incurred to secure the return of the child. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
”  The Court agreed with Judge Davison’s recommendation that the Court disallow compensation for fees associated with collateral state proceedings and reduce all unclear or comingled time entries by 50%, arguing that those hours were necessarily incurred to secure the return of the child. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 7:34 am by Eric Goldman
Konrath State Legislator Doesn’t Understand That He Works for the Government–Attwood v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb – but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
(…) Considering the totality of these circumstances, the district court correctly held that Randall acted under color of state law in banning Davison from the Chair’s Facebook Page. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:33 am by Meg Martin
If you need assistance using the Universal Citation format, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.] [read post]