Search for: "Diamond Decisions Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2018, 8:41 pm
Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) cancelling registration of his mark "WU DANG TAI CHI GREEN TEA" due to a likelihood of confusion with Diamond Hong, Inc.'s registered mark, "TAI CHI," pursuant to 15 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Yesterday, the Third Circuit, sitting en banc, handed down its long-awaited decision in the "diamonds" antitrust class action, Sullivan v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm
Minco, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
DB Investments, Inc., 2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,736. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:17 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
In re The Hyman Companies, Inc., Serial No. 85483397 (January 14, 2015) [not precedential].A mark is deceptive if: (1) it contains matter that is misdescriptive of the character, quality, function, composition or use of the goods; (2) prospective purchasers would be likely to believe that the misdescription actually describes the goods; and (3) the misdescription would be likely to affect a significant portion of the relevant consumers’ decision to purchase the goods.The… [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 9:02 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:51 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 6:33 am
In the recent decision of Diamond State Tire, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:52 pm
The class certification decision in In Diamond Foods, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:40 am
Diamond Foods, Inc., __ Cal.App.4th __ (2010), upholding the trial’s court order striking class allegations based on a class action waiver. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:25 pm
Z Kor Diamonds, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm
On August 13, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Professors Lefstin and Menell
6 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 8:50 pm
Last month, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:53 pm
Last week, Sequenom filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel's decision in June was inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
