Search for: "District Photo Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2018, 8:03 am
District Court, District of Oregon alleging that Nike, Inc., an Oregon Corporation with place of Business in Beaverton, Oregon infringed a photograph taken by Plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:01 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorney Richard Bell of McCordsville, Indiana filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Cision US, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
On June 15, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Judge Juan Sanchez denied a motion to dismiss counts of trade secret misappropriation against Joshua Andrew Adams, a former project engineer for PDC Machines, Inc. who left […] [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:42 am
Indianapolis, IN – Richard Bell of McCordsville, IN filed three separate copyright infringement suits in the Southern District of Indiana against GSE Audio Visual (“GSE”), Christy Joy Caley (“Caley”) and Maryco Cleaning Service, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:24 am
Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc., November 2, 2018, Arnold, M.). [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:32 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorney Richard Bell of McCordsville, Indiana filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, The Association for Behavior Analysis, Inc., infringed his rights to the “Indianapolis Photo” registered on August 4, 2011 with the US Copyright Office, Registration No. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:55 am
On April 12, 2021, Florida-based creative agency, Creative Klick Agency LLC, filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Dan Bilzerian and his spirits company, Ignite Spirits Inc. and related companies. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:55 am
On April 12, 2021, Florida-based creative agency, Creative Klick Agency LLC, filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Dan Bilzerian and his spirits company, Ignite Spirits Inc. and related companies. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:30 am
Google, Inc., Case No. 14-14525 (11th Cir. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:01 pm
Amazon decision, a district court in Texas (in the case of Live Nation Motor Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:49 pm
District Court in New York urging the release of Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse photos. [read post]
8 May 2018, 5:47 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorney Richard Bell of McCordsville, Indiana filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Leapgo, Inc. infringed its rights to the “Indianapolis Photo” registered on August 4, 2011 with the US Copyright Office, Registration No. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
Fort Wayne, IN - Trademark lawyers for 80/20, Inc. of Columbia City, Indiana filed a trademark infringement suit in the Northern District of Indianaalleging Parco Inc of Huntertown, Indiana and Phillip Andrew Roser of Fort Wayne, Indiana infringed trademark registration no. 2,699,302 for the mark 80/20 and no. 3,362,571 for the mark AUTO QUOTER registered by the US Trademark Office as well as three unregistered trademarks. 80/20 also alleges Parco has infringed five… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:02 am
In SHL Imaging, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am
Department of Defense to release graphic photos of the slain Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.In a 29-page Memorandum of Decision last year in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:04 am
TeamSoft, Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
