Search for: "Doe 17" Results 1 - 20 of 35,327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 9:07 am by Jennifer Stephens
Does It Pay to Hire a Law Firm Librarian? [read post]
5 May 2021, 7:43 am by support
It does not matter if the 17-year-old participates willingly in the sexting because a 17-year-old is a minor. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
P. 17(a)(1) ("An action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 10:29 am by Eleonora Rosati
 Here are 3 key highlights:Article 17 not a sui generis right of communication to the publicAn actual sui generis KatFirst, the Guidance takes a different view from the one provisionally expressed in September 2020.It states that Article 17 is lex specialis to the InfoSoc Directive, but also that the provision does not create a special/sui generis right of communication to the public compared to the one already contained in Article 3 of the latter:Article 17… [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:37 am by Steinberg Law Firm
US Route 17 Alternate is also known as a dangerous road, although it does not experience as many car accidents as US Route 17. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Appeal of Student With A Disability, No. 16, 286 (Aug. 17, 2011), is an interesting case. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Among convict’s assortment of doomed pro se arguments: blaming Nike for not warning that its shoes might be injurious when used in stomping a victim [Oregon, Lowering the Bar] Reinstated University of Colorado “deviance” prof: colleges sacrifice academic freedom to risk/liability fears [Chronicle of Higher Education] Wisconsin court ruling “deals major setback to John Doe probe into recall elections” [Daniel Bice and Dave Umhoefer, Milwaukee… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 3:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unlike its content-agnostic counterpart the Digital Services Act, the copyright-specific Art. 17 does not itself have the force of law; it requires transposition into national law, and different countries have taken different approaches to that transposition. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Kevin Tobia (Georgetown University), Aileen Nielsen, Alexander Stremitzer, When Does Physician Use of AI Increase Liability? [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:59 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
It is also noted that the draft Art. 60 does not specifically provide that legitimate uses of content (such as in quotes, reviews or parodies) are excluded from its scope.The overarching question is why Ukraine would decide to implement Art. 17, when it was not bound to it. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 6:55 am
**WARNING--Not even remotely law-related** Does February 17, 2009 mean anything to you? [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:34 am by PaulKostro
In Pennell, we held that the limitations on retroactive modifications of child support obligations in N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a does not apply when the support obligation relates to a child who has become emancipated. [read post]
It is an irreversible punishment that does not allow for correction; is wasteful of taxpayer dollars; does not make communities safer; and cannot be and never has been administered fairly and equitably. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:13 am by Eleonora Rosati
A Member State does not enjoy the freedom to, say, introduce an exception for quotation but refrain from also introducing an exception for parody insofar as the activities referred to in Article 17 are concerned. [read post]