Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-100" Results 1 - 20 of 3,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2023, 6:55 am by Tobin Admin
SECRET TRUTH #2 REVEALED: the defendant in the court does NOT pay the verdict–their car insurance company pays it. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 7:08 am
"It has taken many years, but the court finally has concluded that it is authorized to hold, and does hold, that a district court, in sentencing a defendant, may properly take into account the fact that the 100-to-1 ratio embedded in the Sentencing Guidelines for crack-to-powdered cocaine offenses bears no meaningful relationship to a defendant's culpability. [read post]
8 May 2009, 6:18 pm
Chadbourne & Parke, LLP, and Doe Defendants 1-100 [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 7:05 pm by Kenan Farrell
Perriguey of Law Works LLC Defendant:     William Michael Jones, Mindy Jones, www.boneprone.com, www.tubekings.com, www.socalmovies.com, La Vista, Chin Holdings China, Marvin Greencarrier, John Does 1100, John Doe Companies 1-100 Cause:    Copyright Infringement, Contributory Copyright Infringement, Vicarious Copyright Infringement, Inducement of Copyright Infringement, False Designation of Origin… [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Defendants sued by Finjan included WebWasher and DOES 1 THROUGH 100. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm by Bruce Nye
      But he doesn't know which chemicals were responsible, so he simply files suit against "Does 1 through 100," without naming any defendants at all. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 7:26 am
US District Judge Lynn Adelman, continuing his strong post-Booker work in cases like Greer (discussed here) and Smith (discussed here), has released a new sentencing decision in which he attempts to "refract" the concerns with the 100:1 crack/powder cocaine ratio through an individual defendant's case. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
The copyright owner files the lawsuit naming "DOES 1 to 100," and then seeks the identities of the Doe defendants from the Internet Service Provider (ISP). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 2:47 pm by Steve Statsinger
He gave the defendant fifteen months, holding that the 100-to-1 penalty ratio between crack cocaine and powder "does not make any sense at all. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am by Holly Brezee
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:00 am by Gene Quinn
The questions asked of the USPTO, and specifically Director Kappos, related to the USPTO interpretation of the grace period in 102(b)(1)(B). [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:00 am by Gene Quinn
The questions asked of the USPTO, and specifically Director Kappos, related to the USPTO interpretation of the grace period in 102(b)(1)(B). [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm by Holly Brezee
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:05 pm by Simon Gibbs
The matter was funded by way of a CFA with a 100% success fee. [read post]