Search for: "Doe Defendants 6-10" Results 1 - 20 of 6,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2008, 10:48 am
Date: 10/6/2008 10:09 PMBy DAVID TWIDDYAssociated Press WriterKANSAS CITY, Mo. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm by emagraken
 The Defendant failed to raise an objection of the expert’s qualifications under the timelines set out in Rule 11-6(10). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:23 am by Marty Schwimmer
The now searchable  list of defendants in an infringement action brought by Burberry (SDNY 1:12-cv-00479-TPG) (complaint not on ECF) John Doe 1 QIAO RENFENG A/KA QIU YANYANG AIKIA LIN RUI A/K/A CHEN DERONG A/K/ A XUE BINXUAN A/K/A YONGBO LI A/KIA XIAO JINGJING A/KIA JIANG AI A/KIA XUZHEYE XUZHEYE A/KIA XU ZHEYE A/KIA ZHOUMINMIN AIKIA ZHAO LI AIKIA ZHENG LINTIAN A/K/A LINTIAN ZHENG AIKIA John Doe 2 A/K/A LIUQING WU A/K/A WU LIUQI G John Doe 3 AIKIA HONGPUYI… [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:26 am by Jon Sands
Marquez-Lobos, No. 10-10470 (6-19-12) (M. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:58 am by David M. Trontz
The employee received a 10 month prison sentence for her involvement in the theft. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(…)The defendant objects to Topics 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 17 in large part because the plaintiff seeks fact-specific information that is normally elicited by means other than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition since such information does not relate to the defendant's corporate position. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
In People v Jenkins (2008 NY Slip Op 07992 [10/23/08]) the Court of Appeals considered who has to prove what in order for a defendant to be entitled to specific compliance of a plea agreement. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:24 am by Jon Sands
Tagatac, No. 21-10133 (6-10-22)(Nelson w/Bybee & Bolton). [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm by Gregory B. Williams
Symantec Corporation, Civil Action No. 10-1067-LPS (D.Del., January 6, 2015), the Court granted Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures I LLC’s (“IV”) motion in limine seeking to preclude argument and evidence disparaging IV’s business model and practices to the extent that Defendant Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) may not refer to IV as a “patent troll” during trial. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 12:00 am by Luke Salzwedel
On February 6, 2017, an Israeli newspaper article about defendant Israel’s arrest concerning the allegedly falsified report prompted a 30% decline in value of Kitov stock. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am by Holly Brezee
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 2:26 am
Soltero, No. )6-50257 (10-19-07). [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Kevin Smith and Lindsay Colvin
Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), at 1. [3] Id. at 26 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [4] Id. at 1. [5] Id. at 4. [6] Id. at 6-7. [7] Id. at 7-8. [8] Id. at 12. [9] Id. at 33 (Alito, J., dissenting). [10] Id. at 23 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [11] Id. at 31 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [read post]