Search for: "Doe Entities 1-10"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 4:07 am
(No. 2013-1165, 1/10/2014). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
This feature thus does not give a basis for certain characteristics of the container or its nozzle being defined as a function of the hub as second entity. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
On the other hand, in the context of a traditional 90/10 real estate joint venture, where the 90% partner is ultimately excluded from the definition of the Reporting Company (for example, where the 90% partner is a public company), the joint venture entity would nonetheless have to report any individuals satisfying the Beneficial Ownership test on the developer/sponsor (10%) side of the deal.4. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
Finally, what does all this mean for Blake Anderson Events, Inc.? [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:57 pm
The budgetary calendar resets on October 1, 2011, which marks the start of Fiscal Year 2012. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:08 am
Varam, Inc., et. al., 1-10-cv-06038 (NYSD October 19, 2012, Order) (Stein, J.). [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:22 pm
Since 10-10-10 this is no longer possible. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:55 am
Treatment of Certain Domestic Entities Disregarded as Separate From Their Owners as Corporations for Purposes of Section 6038A (5/10/2016), amending regulations Sections 1.6038A-1, 1.6038A-2, and 301.7701-2.Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:28 pm
Be aware that this reluctance alone does not mean an alternate structure is not viable and/or desirable. 4. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:13 am
Huntington Health and Rehabilitation Administrator, Annica Stansberry, and John Does 1 through 10 were also named in the suit. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:37 pm
Does, 10-cv-05022-LHK (N.D. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:45 pm
Does it matter? [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 12:49 pm
App. 1 Cir. 9/12/11), 77 So.3d 39. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
That primary annuitant is the individual beneficiary (not the grantor), so distributions after the death of that beneficiary are not subject to the 10% addition to tax.Code § 72(u)(1) nondeferral to trust owners. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 1:53 pm
But the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (745 ILCS 10/1-101) provides that for actions against a “local public entity,” the limitations period is one year. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:31 am
Some of the major issues are:1. [read post]
New Rule Pertaining to John Doe Designations in Pleadings Recently Went Into Effect - Pa.R.C.P. 2005
6 May 2019, 9:43 am
Under the Rule, the Doe defendant’s actual name must be unknown to the plaintiff or the defendant joining party after the completion of a reasonable search for the person using due diligence.According to the Comment, an effort to list as parties, “Defendants John Doe 1-10 is frowned upon.The Rule also requires a specific allegation in the pleading confirming that the Doe designation is a designation of a fictitious person or entity. [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:02 pm
Therefore, governmental entities that are neither cities nor counties (e.g., special districts and joint powers authorities) may consider requesting the transfer of CLFR funds from governmental entities with transfer authority (i.e., the state, cities, and counties) (See Secs. 602(c)(3); 603(c)(3).) [5] See Sec. 603(c)(1). [6] Sec. 603(c)(1)(A); Rule, pp. 10-45. [7] Sec. 603(c)(1)(B); Rule, pp. 45-51. [8] Sec. 603(c)(1)(C); Rule, pp.… [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 11:07 am
Nonetheless, the prior 10% rate will continue to apply dispositions of a residence if (a) the amount realized is $1 million or less, (b) the transferee will use the property as a residence, and (c) the $300,000 or less exemption from withholding does not apply. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am
John Does 1-10, supra. [read post]
