Search for: "Does 1 - 13" Results 1 - 20 of 22,719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2012, 4:55 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-13 Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00844-TWP-DKL Motion to Dismiss or Sever for Misjoinder and Motion to Quash the Subpoena: View this document on Scribd Proposed Order: View this document on Scribd [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:06 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-14 Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-01629-WTL-DMLFile Date: Friday, October 11, 2013Plaintiff: TCYK, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm by David Friedman
Obviously, every case is different, but here’s a rough version of how we price cases in Chapter 13. 1. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:53 pm by Uthman Law Office
The Court of Appeal held that  the RJA does not violate article VI, section 13 of the California Constitution. [read post]
10 May 2012, 10:40 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-13, another BitTorrent downloading "John Doe" case, a defendant has moved to sever the actions, and to quash the subpoenas.Magistrate Judge E. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 3:41 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00071-RLM-RBCFile Date: Thursday, March 14, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
25 May 2018, 7:36 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) announced that it will fund 87 new projects across 34 states, totaling nearly $13 million in funding. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:42 am
There are misconceptions out there about what a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is and how it works. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:09 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-13, where a pro se litigant had made a motion to quash, sever, and dismiss, anonymously, a Magistrate Judge has ruled that the motion could not be made anonymously in the manner the litigant employed.June 19, 2012, Report and Recommendation denying anonymous pro se motion var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:14 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-14 (Romantic Memories) Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00166-PPS-RBCFile Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:11 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-14 (Romantic Memories) Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00164-PPS-RBCFile Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
We agree with the court that Gant does not apply retroactively to the petitioner’s habeas trial, and affirm the summary judgment") Published: 1/13/2014 11:36 AM [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:42 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-13, a subpoena addressed to Verizon, calling for the identities and addresses of John Doe defendants, was returnable May 12th.On May 10th the Court stayed enforcement of the subpoena, and directed plaintiff's counsel to immediately notify Verizon of the stay.Unfortunately, as it turns out, Verizon had responded to the subpoena FIVE (5) DAYS BEFORE THE SUBPOENA'S RETURN DATE, on May 7th.Plaintiff's "motion for clarification"[Ed.… [read post]
23 May 2013, 6:30 am by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-14 (Romantic Memories) Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00165-PPS-RBCFile Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John Doe 9Cause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Northern District of IndianaJudge: Chief Judge Philip P SimonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey View this document on Scribd [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 11:15 pm
EXPLANATION OF THE TOPEKA DISCOUNT RATE by Jan Hamilton, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee The Discount Rate (Interest Rate) for chapter 13 bankruptcy cases filed in Topeka, Kansas, on or after March 1, 2009, is 4.75%. [read post]