Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2012, 7:52 am
John Does 1-33 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01292-SEB-DML File Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Plaintiff: Third Degree Films, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
(Or, Why A Feminist Thinks Section 33 Does Matter)” I said, “Whatever merits it might have, dressed up as a means to represent the will of the people against the follies of unelected courts, recourse to section 33 may actually legitimate the continuation of prejudice. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:43 am
Does 1-33, the RIAA's attempt to obtain the identities of students at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, "John Doe #28", a student at the University, has made a motion to quash the subpoena which has been served.According to the News Sentinel, this is the first attempt to attack the challenge to the RIAA's discovery proceedings in Knoxville.Knoxville News Sentinel articleLitigation documents:Motion to Quash*Memorandum of Law in Support of… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
The suit contends that the statement that current law allows insurers to “set prices” is not true and does not describe Prop 33 accurately since “all automobile insurance rates and rating class plans must be approved in advance by the Insurance Commissioner,” and Prop 33 does not change this system. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
So what does Section 33(g) boil down to? [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 1:42 pm
Apparently not, according to IC 33-22-1, "Effect of Recodification of Title 33. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
The contingency fee allowed in a personal injury case varies from state to state, but generally it is either 1/3 (33 1/3%) or 40%. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:30 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s Opinion On September 21, 2021, the Ninth Circuit, in a 2-1 opinion written by Judge Jane A. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:58 am
Does 1-33, No. 13 C 1323, Slip Op. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:34 am
Does your company allow insiders to voluntarily terminate a Rule 10b5-1 plan? [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:26 am
” OHA continued: “FAR subpart 33.1 does not apply to size protests, but rather pertains to bid protests filed with the procuring agency or the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:23 pm
Demonstrably intoxicated defendant (.27% & .33%) could consent to a search. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:24 pm
While the evidence is fairly case-specific, the First does a background as to what needs to be shown in a motion for a new trial based on States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:45 am
§ 33-931. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 8:40 am
” The ninety-day waiting period does not apply, if the divorce petition is filed for any of the following reasons: 1. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
.): 1 Indictment 33 Joint Memorandum in Support of Plea Agreement 36 Magistrate Minute Order: “This Court does not have jurisdiction over the charge in the proposed Plea Agreement. . . . [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
The Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the imposition of a reprimand The plaintiff first claims that rule 3.3 (a) (1) does not apply because the Probate Court had appointed her to act as fiduciary for an estate. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:31 am
Both the First and Second Departments have previously held that CPL 440.30(1-a) does not permit defendants who have pleaded guilty to seek such DNA testing of forensic evidence (People v Lebron, 44 AD3d 310 [2007]; People v Byrdsong, 33 AD3d 175 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 3:42 pm
§ 33-931 does not define “health insurance,” the A.R.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:45 am
§ 33-931 does not define “health insurance,” the A.R.S. [read post]
