Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 9:59 am
Does 1-45, Doe #41 has filed his or her reply memorandum.Reply Memorandum of Doe #41 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm
John Does 1-45, Doe #41 has filed a motion to sever John Does 2-45, dismiss the complaint as to them, and quash the related subpoenas.Notice of MotionMemorandum of LawDoe #41 DeclarationMorlan Ty Rogers Affidavit var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
Does 1-45, a Manhattan BitTorrent download case, the motion by defendant Doe #41 to sever, dismiss, and quash, has been granted by District Judge Barbara S. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm
Does 1-45 Plaintiff's memorandum of law in opposition to motion by Doe #41 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
Where the government does not show that a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property will interfere with a grand jury investigation, it can be granted. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2 1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion:November 17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm
Does 1-45, the plaintiff has filed its papers responding to the motion to quash filed by pro se defendant Doe #8.Plaintiff's time to respond to a separate motion filed by defendant Doe #41 has not run yet.Plaintiff's memorandum of law responding to motion by defendant Doe #8 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 10:06 am
That’s why we need your help in speaking out against the changes to Rule 41. 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:29 pm
If Congress does nothing, then the rule change will automatically go into effect on December 1, dramatically expanding law enforcement’s authority to hack computers both inside and outside the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:54 pm
Probation Basics The district courts in Michigan (including the 41-A District) has jurisdiction to sentence offenders for misdemeanor criminal offenses which can carry up to 1 year in jail. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
As the government notes, however, the relevant portion of Rule 41 does not include the word “notice. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
On Thursday, the Supreme Court passed the proposed change to Rule 41 and sent it to Congress on Thursday, which will have until December 1 to modify, reject, or defer the proposal. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:33 am
Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in placement of a GPS on the exterior of his SUV, so Rule 41(b)(4) does not apply, even if it could because state officers put it there in a state investigation. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:16 pm
If Congress does nothing, this massive change will automatically go into effect on December 1. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
John Does 1-5U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:20 pm
The proposed changes to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure—which are set to automatically go into effect on December 1—would make it easier for the government to get a warrant to hack into a computer. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:43 am
Art. 41(1) CDR does not mention patents but only designs and utility models. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:57 am
Art. 41(1) CDR does not mention patents but only designs and utility models. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:35 pm
P. 41(f)(1)(D). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:43 am
We cannot add the other technical requirements of Title III because Title III does not cover video surveillance. [read post]
