Search for: "Does 1-36"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2021, 9:03 am
John Doe 1, in which Doe does not appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
NEWS: Is the Civil Union Act, N.J.S.A. 37:1-28 to -36, constitutional? [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/YSimbAGMLxg" height="1" width="1"/> [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:46 am
This Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 opportunity will be funded by DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) and supports priorities in: (1) advanced engine and fuel technologies; (2) lightweight materials; (3) new energy efficient mobility systems; and (4) alternative fuels technology demonstrations. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
“A married couple does not qualify as a first-time homebuyer unless the husband and the wife both satisfy paragraph (1) or unless the husband and wife both satisfy paragraph (6). [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:37 pm
The CA approved the DD, 28 months of confinement, and reduction to E-1. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:05 am
R.1:36-3.1:36-3. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
We agree with the court that Gant does not apply retroactively to the petitioner’s habeas trial, and affirm the summary judgment") Published: 1/13/2014 11:36 AM [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
.): 1 Indictment 33 Joint Memorandum in Support of Plea Agreement 36 Magistrate Minute Order: “This Court does not have jurisdiction over the charge in the proposed Plea Agreement. . . . [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
1 in 3 Americans have no savings? [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
1 in 3 Americans have no savings? [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
The California Court of Appeal understandably concludes that his subsequent conviction for attempted murder does not automatically disqualify him for relief under Prop. 36.But Mr. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
9.Jurisdiction; determination.a.A court of this State has jurisdiction to declare a person incapacitated and appoint a guardian or issue a protective order for a respondent if:(1)This State is the respondent's home state as defined in section 3 of P.L.2012, c.36 (C.3B:12B-3); or(2)On the date the petition is filed, this State is a significant-connection state, as defined in section 3 of P.L.2012, c.36 (C.3B:12B-3) and determined in accordance with section 10 of… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:38 pm
Indianapolis, IN - A bill pending in the Indiana General Assembly would make changes to Indiana's Right of Publicity Law, I.C. 32-36-1-8. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
A reasonable interpretation of claims 16 and 36 consistent with Appellants’ Specification is that the claims recite no more than software per se which does not fall within one of the four categories of subject matter that are eligible for patent protection under § 101: (1) processes; (2) machines; (3) manufactures; and (4) compositions of matter. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
Prop Reg § 1.6050P-1 Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm
§ 36-11-1. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
Senate Bill 1164 which enacted the 15-week law contained the following provision on "Construction" of the law:This act does not: 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:29 am
However, Article 36(5) of MiFIR provides that as regards exchange-traded derivatives (ETDs), a trading venue which falls below the threshold of annual notional amount traded of EUR 1 million in the calendar year preceding the date of application of MiFIR, may, before 3 January 2018, notify ESMA and its competent authority (CA) that it does not wish to be bound by this article for a period of 30 months from the application of the Regulation. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:51 am
Noting "[R]emoval from office pursuant to Public Officers Law §36 is an extreme remedy reserved for officials engaged in self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or violation of a public trust," the court said that [1] Isaman admitted that he should have abstained from those votes and [2] his failure to do so "does not constitute the type of conduct that would warrant removal from office. [read post]
