Search for: "Does 1-68"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
In its decision, the Supreme Court resolved the split by concluding that an unaccepted Rule 68 settlement offer does not moot the action. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:04 am
Dec. 1, 2014), the Eleventh Circuit held that an unaccepted offer of judgment, made pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, does not serve to moot a class action. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:03 am
Does 1-68, No. 12 C 6675, Slip Op. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:40 am
The CDC reports that since April, 277 persons infected with Salmonella Saintpaul with the same genetic fingerprint have been identified in 28 states and the District of Columbia: Arkansas (2 persons), Arizona (19), California (6), Colorado (1), Connecticut (2), Florida (1), Georgia (7), Idaho (3), Illinois (34), Indiana (7), Kansas (8), Kentucky (1), Maryland (1), Michigan (2), Missouri (4), New Mexico (68), New York (2), North Carolina (1), Ohio… [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:40 am
Additionally, Mey's solution conforms with the language of both Rule 68 (containing no such exception) and Rule 1 (providing that all Rules, unless otherwise specified, shall apply in all federal civil cases) by allowing Rule 68 to apply where class certification does not take place. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:21 am
See Ch. 2015-68, §§ 1-8, Laws of Fla. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985):If an offer recites that costs are included or specifies an amount for costs, and the plaintiff accepts the offer, the judgment will necessarily include costs; if the offer does not state that costs are included and an amount for costs is not specified, the court will be obliged by the terms of the Rule to include in its judgment an additional amount which in its discretion, it determines to be sufficient to cover the costs.In this case, defendant served a… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
P. 7001(1)[v]Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:05 am
Here: 67-1 Think Finance Motion to Dismiss Rule 19 68-1 Think Motion to Dismiss Rule 12 and 17 70-1 Think Motion to Dismiss 73 Rees Motion to Dismiss 75 Commonwealth Opposition 93 DCT Order Excerpts: In both Hotleva and Chehalis, the actions of the non-party would preclude the relief sought. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
State, 165 S.W.3d 68, 69-75 (Tex. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:47 am
Such a high effective tax rate does not even apply to cigarettes in New York City or Chicago. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:59 am
Dec. 1, 2014). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:28 am
This change was made by section 68 of the Deregulation Act 2015. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 12:08 pm
On January 11, 2010, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) released its 2010 Tariff Amendments (T2010-1), which affects Chapters 1, 2, 4, 6, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 38, 40, 42, 43, 56, 59, 64, 65, 68, 70, 89, 94, & 96. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:36 am
The Second Circuit says it does not matter. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Ct. 1523 (2013): Does an offer of full relief to the plaintiff under Fed. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:20 am
Geier, No. 2-10-0112, slip op. at 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
How does this restelss movement affect legal malpractice clients? [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The post What does Chapter 13 bankruptcy cost? [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:06 am
Problem is, Defendants did not attach a copy of the offer of judgment that was purportedly served.Instead, Defendants referenced an "Exhibit 1" in their briefing. [read post]
