Search for: "Does 1-89"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 7:27 am
On 26 June 2023, the European Commission published a report on its assessment on the adequacy of the information to be disclosed under Article 89(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD IV). [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:17 am
Here are the questions presented: (1) Does Irwin’s rebuttable... [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm
No. 89-732, 80 Stat. 1161, as amended, does not negate his or her jurisdiction over the removal... [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:20 am
Department of Energy (DOE) funding opportunity of up to $89 million in support of innovative, advanced manufacturing research and development (R&D) projects. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 2:10 pm
The IPKat has come across a reference to the ECJ under the Art.234 procedure, calling on the court to interpret Directive 89/104, Art.3(1)(e) first indent (shapes resulting from the nature of the goods themselves). [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:36 pm
Patent No. 9,326,945 (“the ’945 patent”): (1) “apixaban particles have a D90 equal to or less than about 89 microns,” see id. at 313 ¶ 19, and (2) “crystalline apixaban particles,” see id. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
The rejections of claims 1, 84-87, 89-94, 96-99, 101, 107, 108, 112,and 115-118 are affirmed.KSR was cited as to claim 1:The selection of an appropriate depth of field for the Campbell endoscope from a range known in the art amounts to no more than the implementation of a known feature with a predictable result, which bars patentability. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Additionally, SB-89 would amend § 25-5- 77(j) of The Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act to create a rebuttable presumption that medical treatment is not related to the work injury when the employee does not receive medical treatment related to the claimed injury for a period of two years. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:41 pm
[The IPKat says that this question is badly phrased - does it refer to 1(i) or (ii)? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
However, there is no evidence that the service has actually been executed. [1.7.3] The Board does not concur with the intervener on its interpretation of § 167 ZPO. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
From a more general perspective, the Court noted that the admissibility or validity of an application for a declaration of invalidity does not depend on the good faith of the applicant. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 12:08 pm
On January 11, 2010, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) released its 2010 Tariff Amendments (T2010-1), which affects Chapters 1, 2, 4, 6, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 38, 40, 42, 43, 56, 59, 64, 65, 68, 70, 89, 94, & 96. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:05 am
Chiachiere’s request that the Commissioner grant him a certificate of good faith pursuant to Education Law §3811(1).Granting such a certificate would allow the school board to indemnify Dr. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the composition of product 1 comprises o-aminophenol, HC red 3, and 4-amino 3-nitrophenol, whereas product 2 does not. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Therefore, the interpretation of Article 3(1)(e) of Directive 89/104 which I am proposing does not preclude a parallel assessment of the same circumstances to determine whether one or more of the grounds referred to in the individual indents obtains. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:48 pm
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy soughtto limit a claim depicting a specific three-dimensionalorientation to a racemic mixture. 457 F.3d 1284, 1288–89(Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
An internet referencing service provider which stores, as a keyword, a sign identical with a trade mark and organises the display of advertisements on the basis of that keyword does not use that sign within the meaning of Article 5(1) and (2) of Directive 89/104 or of Article 9(1) of Regulation No 40/94. 3. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
So what does it mean and what is its impact? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
This had set up a website providing links that would circumvent C More's paywall and allow users to watch live ice hockey matches without paying the SEK 89 (approx £7) fee per match. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:32 am
[11] Id. at *2 (citing Thyroff, 8 N.Y.3d at 288-89) [read post]
