Search for: "Don Rodriguez" Results 1 - 20 of 927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 4:29 pm
I haven't seen the cert petition, so I don't know what the QP is. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:35 pm by Lori J. Paul, AACP
While I don’t ordinarily talk about sports related issues, this one caught my eye because of the assault caused by the Mets’ pitcher, Francisco Rodriguez. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:21 am by Alyson Grine
By now, most court actors are familiar with the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:21 am by Alyson Grine
By now, most court actors are familiar with the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:07 pm
We generally don't deport people on the basis of having a tiny amount of marijuana for personal use.But the Ninth Circuit holds that this rule doesn't help Dan Rodriguez. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
Admittedly, I don't practice immigration law (except for isolated pro bono matters), but the kind of delay I get to see from the outside seems fairly intolerable. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:04 pm
Rodriguez: I don’t want anything more than money and sex. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:57 pm by Andrew Babb
I don’t want to leap to conclusions here, but I hope you understand why I’m a little skeptical. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 7:37 am by Michael Perry
I don’t agree with every position taken in Darling, or with... [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:02 am by SHG
We don’t think it was very nice of her to threaten the lives and safety of our clients,” Kirk said. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by SHG
  Don’t rush the ticket, because nobody knows how long it does, or should, take to complete the core mission. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 3:14 pm
 Plus testimony that you don't normally expect in a palimony action against an attorney. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
”  They don’t include incompetence, stupidity, or carelessness. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:24 am
But I don’t think the results in these two cases has to be explained by what the Justices ate for breakfast or what they saw on TV. [read post]