Search for: "Dragon Products, Ltd." Results 1 - 20 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 9:35 am
According to court documents, Shenzhen-based Teelio Technology Co Ltd, initiated the legal battle last year, alleging that Shanda's Chinese name for "Dragon Nest," "Long Zhi Gu," infringed "Long Gu," a registered trademark of Teelio. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 10:03 pm by News Desk
Ltd., an affiliate of the Aurora, IL-based OSI Group, sued the company last year for allegedly requiring him to falsify production dates on meat packages. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
Don't worry, IP Dragon has not lost its focus on IP in China. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Pfizer starts R&D in China after IPR in China challenges (IP Dragon) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 1:21 am by IP Dragon
There are ample examples of companies that transferred their technology in the hope of selling more products in the future, only to find out that their customer metamorphosed into formidable competitors.Speed railway system: Alstom (France), Siemens Mobility (Germany), Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:48 am by Eric Schweibenz
  LG also asserted that OSRAM provided evidence that only the Golden Dragon Plus LUW W5AM and the LCW G6CP LEDs practice the patents-in-suit, and that OSRAM did not demonstrate that these two products are representative of all OSRAM LEDs with chip level conversion technology. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:38 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The complaint specifically refers to OSRAM’s TOPLED and related products, DRAGON family and related products, OSLON family and related products, CERAMOS and related products, OSLUX and related products, and Sylvania products that contain the OSRAM accused LEDs. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Prior litigation-induced licenses of patent-in-suit not excluded from evidence: ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:25 am
But in Magmatic Ltd v PMS International Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 181, PMS has won its appeal to the Court of Appeal.RCDs protect any aspect of the appearance of the whole or a part of a product resulting from its lines, contours, colour, shape or texture or the materials of which it is made. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 4:18 pm
As a result, defendant Leviton Electric (Dongguan) Co Ltd has been prohibited from selling 50,000 products. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:18 pm by Apeng
(IP Whiteboard) (Patentology) (ipwars) Northern District of Ohio: Qui Tam provision found unconstitutional: Unique Product Solutions Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm by Apeng
(IPKat) 85% of all products seized at EU border originate from China / ?????????? [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:07 am
 He is quite surprised though that the Dragons chose to invest in someone who apparently had no control of a patent covering the product he was pitching, which he presumably would have known at the time the pitch was made. [read post]