Search for: "Dues, et al v. Applied Card Systems, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
That issue can arise, as it does in the new case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:28 am
Board of Review et al. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
JOHN DOE I, ET AL. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
The same principle should apply to the present case. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
This is the same outcome as the 11th Circuit. digital due process requirements, including an appellate process for aggrieved users. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 10:59 am
In Rider et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
The Trusts had instead relied on a business records affidavit signed by a “Legal Case Manager” employed by Transworld Systems, Inc. with a assortment of exhibits attached to it. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Publicis Group SA, et al, 2012 U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:28 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
Against the background of recent back to work legislation affecting Air Canada workers, postal workers, and teachers, this case, Saskatchewan Federation of Labour et al v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Sorrell, et al., No. 5:14-cv-117). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Sorrell, et al., No. 5:14-cv-117). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
LARACH and GREAT AMERICAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
(Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman participated.) *** Loyalhanna Health Care Associates t/d/b/a Loyalhanna Care Center, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership (6-CA-28609, et al.; 352 NLRB No. 105) Latrobe, PA June 30, 2008. [read post]