Search for: "ED MOLONEY"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2012, 2:03 pm
Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre have appealed from Judge Young’s decision dismissing their complaint against the government. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
As predicted, Ed Moloney & Anthony McIntyre have filed a motion asking the First Circuit to stay its mandate pending the filing of a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
As expected, Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre have sought a rehearing in the Belfast Project Case. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
Yesterday Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre filed their reply brief in their appeal of Judge Young’s denial of their motion for leave to intervene and his dismissal of their claims against Attorney General Holder. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
On April 4, the First Circuit will hear oral arguments on the two appeals brought by Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre in the Belfast Project case. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:58 pm
Mary Daly of University College, Dublin (13:51) and followed by an interview with Eamon Dornan, the lawyer for Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre (at 24:05), and Alan Shatter, the Irish government’s Minister of Justice and Equality (29:45). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:05 pm
Eastern time (that’s 7 p.m. for those of you in Ireland) on January 24, Judge Young will be holding a hearing on the government’s motion to dismiss the complaint Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre have brought against the Attorney General. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:30 pm
Ed. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
Ed Moloney in person. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
The First Circuit has rejected the appeal of Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre against an order requiring BC to turn over to the government oral histories taken from participants in the Troubles. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:15 am
The mutual legal assistance treaty between the United States and the United Kingdon Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre’s complaint Moloney & McIntyre’s memorandum in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction The government’s memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss and in opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction Moloney & McIntyre’s memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss The government’s… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:43 pm
The government has filed its brief in the appeal Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre took from Judge Young’s decision denying their motion for leave to intervene in Boston College’s attempt to quash the government’s subpoenas for the Belfast Project interviews. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
The main opponents of the subpoena, Anthony McIntyre and Ed Moloney, two of the BC researchers, read the decision as a clear defeat for oral historians, but I say, “Not so fast! [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
This is probably what the lawyer for Anthony McIntyre and Ed Moloney of the Belfast Project have to look forward to when Judge Young holds court at BC Law School later this month on the merits of their claim. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Then two of the researchers involved with the Project, Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, sought leave to intervene, arguing primarily that the Attorney General had not complied with the MLAT and also raising various constitutional challenges.Yesterday the government responded to Moloney and McIntyre. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Moloney. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Two of the researchers, Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, have sought to intervene to challenge the subpoena. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:30 pm
In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Administrator Sunstein argued that the new order will “promote exports, growth, and job creation by eliminating unnecessary regulatory differences across nations. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:43 pm
Moloney, deserve the blame? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The unsuccessful intervenors, Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, have appealed to the First Circuit from the order denying their motion for leave to intervene, and from “all subsequent Orders relating thereto.” (Question: can the unsuccessful intervenors appeal from anything other than the denial of their motion for leave to intervene? [read post]
