Search for: "ELANA LEE"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 7:33 pm
Feder and Lee, Katherine and Grimmelmann, James and Grimmelmann, James and Daphne Ippolito, Daphne Ippolito and Callison-Burch, Christopher and Choquette-Choo, Christopher A. and Mireshghallah, Niloofar and Brundage, Miles and Mimno, David and Choksi, Madiha Zahrah and Balkin, Jack M. and Carlini, Nicholas and De Sa, Christopher and Frankle, Jonathan and Ganguli, Deep and Gipson, Bryant and Guadamuz, Andres and Harris, Swee Leng and Jacobs, Abigail and Joh, Elizabeth E. and Kamath, Gautam… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced a bill that would require warrants for all email, regardless of how long it has been stored. [read post]
11 May 2010, 10:29 am
Yesterday, May 10th, President Obama nominated Elana Kagan to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:16 am
Elana Bernstein and Geoffrey Bauer (Buy them an ice bucket.)The Case: - This bride graduated summa from Amherst and has a medical degree from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 27 January 2023, Lee J dismissed both the proceedings, which were commenced out of time, and the applicant’s application to stay the proceedings pending the conclusion of a criminal proceedings brought against him in Landrey v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 27. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
– Elana Schor, The Washington Independent, June 1, 2010 A test case for climate change litigation was dismissed by a federal appeals court on Friday in a little-noticed afternoon ruling, leaving the door open for a Supreme Court appeal by plaintiffs who aim to link major industrial emitters with the environmental consequences of the greenhouse gases they produce. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
– Elana Schor, The Washington Independent, June 1, 2010 A test case for climate change litigation was dismissed by a federal appeals court on Friday in a little-noticed afternoon ruling, leaving the door open for a Supreme Court appeal by plaintiffs who aim to link major industrial emitters with the environmental consequences of the greenhouse gases they produce. [read post]
