Search for: "EMPLOYMENT PLUS, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 1,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Lamps Plus Inc v Varela In 2016, a hacker tricked an employee of petitioner Lamps Plus, Inc., into disclosing tax information of about 1,300 company employees. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 The complainant's employer, Steve's Pier One, Inc., [and others] and their respective owner, Joseph Genova, individually, were found liable for the sexual harassment. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm by MEL
Swegon North America Inc.: Ontario Court of Appeal deals blow to termination provisions in employment agreements appeared first on Minken Employment Lawyers. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“Nexus Staffing”), the Plaintiff, claims Nexus Employment Solutions Plus of Indiana, Inc. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:13 pm
The First held that a female employee's "sex-plus" bias claim alleging that her employer failed to promote her to a managerial position because of stereotypes that women who... [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:35 am by Thomas J. Crane
Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000) specifically provided that showing the falsity of the employer’s explanation would require that the jury decide the case, not the judge. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:18 pm by MEL
Zochem Inc. affirmed a Superior Court of Justice decision to award $60,000 in moral damages plus $25,000.00 for human rights violations on top of notice to a woman who endured sexual harassment on the job, and was fired when she complained. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 1:36 pm
In February of this year, a worker from Cooperative Plus, Inc., became entrenched in soybeans that were frozen and came up to worker's chest-level. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Ethan Leib
Today in Lamps Plus Inc. v Varela, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that an ambiguous arbitration provision in an employment agreement may be construed against the drafter to allow class-wide arbitration. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The New York State Division of Human Rights [NYSDHR] found that the employer had unlawfully discriminated against the Complainant by providing a negative employment reference to a prospective employer in retaliation for Complainant's engagement in a protected activity in violation of Executive Law §296, awarding the Complainant "compensatory damages in the principal sum of $5,000 for mental anguish, plus interest at the rate of nine percent… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The New York State Division of Human Rights [NYSDHR] found that the employer had unlawfully discriminated against the Complainant by providing a negative employment reference to a prospective employer in retaliation for Complainant's engagement in a protected activity in violation of Executive Law §296, awarding the Complainant "compensatory damages in the principal sum of $5,000 for mental anguish, plus interest at the rate of nine percent… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:29 pm
But there is a catch: The associates' pay is reduced to $60,000 plus benefits, from about $160,000, and the jobs last one year with no guarantee of further employment. [read post]