Search for: "Echostar Satellite, L.L.C."
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 6:52 pm
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 430 F.3d 1269, 1278 (10th Cir. 2005)). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:24 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with Texas co-counsel, an Indiana attorney for Plaintiffs DISH Network L.L.C., Echostar Technologies L.L.C. and Nagrastar LLC, all of Englewood, Colorado, filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Federal Communications Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:48 am
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division began it’s analysis in VOOM HD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 2012 N.Y. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:22 pm
Northern District of Indiana - Plaintiffs DISH Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and NagraStar LLC, all of Englewood, Colorado, sued in the Northern District of Indiana contending that Defendants Paulette Kincaide and Linnis Kincaide of Gary, Indiana wrongfully intercepted satellite signals. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:22 pm
Northern District of Indiana - Plaintiffs DISH Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and NagraStar LLC, all of Englewood, Colorado, sued in the Northern District of Indiana contending that Defendants Paulette Kincaide and Linnis Kincaide of Gary, Indiana wrongfully intercepted satellite signals. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., recently adopted strict federal standards with respect to a party's obligations to preserve documents prior to litigation. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:51 am
Echostar Satellite L.L.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:33 am
New Albany, Indiana - Intellectual property attorneys for DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and NagraStar L.L.C., all of Englewood, Colorado (collectively, "DISH Network"), filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Danny Abner of Paris Crossing, Indiana illegally intercepted, decrypted and viewed DISH Network satellite programming. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:11 am
Defendant’s nonresponse to plaintiff’s waiver request did not amount to an intentional relinquishment of her rights (see EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. v ESPN, Inc., 79 AD3d 614, 617-618 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (1st Dept.2012); Zubulake v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (First Dept. 2012). [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
Echostar Satellite, L.L.C., 529 F.3d 617 (5th Cir. 2008). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
In its opinion VOOM HD Holdings LLC, v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., in which the defendant had appealed from the trial court's grant of plaintiff's motion to impose sanctions for the spoilation of evidence, the First Department of the Appellate Division (in between NY's state trial level courts, unintuitively called Supreme Courts, and NY's highest court, the Court of Appeals), held... [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
Directv, Inc. and Echostar Satellite L.L.C., collectively "the satellite companies," appeal from the district court's dismissal of their claims against Mark Treesh, the Commissioner of the Department of Revenue for the state of Kentucky. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:22 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33, 939 N.Y.S.2d 321 (1st Dept. 2012), decision which held that “destruction that is the result of gross negligence” also “is sufficient to presume relevance. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (1st Dept. 2012); and Zubulake v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:22 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33, 939 N.Y.S.2d 321 (1st Dept. 2012), decision which held that “destruction that is the result of gross negligence” also “is sufficient to presume relevance. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
Thus, " [o]nce a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a litigation hold' to ensure the preservation of relevant documents'" (Voom VD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., ___ AD3d ___, 2010 NY Slip Op. 00658 [1st Dept 2012], quoting (Zubulake v UBS Warburg LLC, 220 FRD 212, 218 [SD NY 2003] ). [read post]
