Search for: "Elevation Co., Ltd." Results 1 - 20 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Otis Elevator Co., --- N.E.2d ----, 77 Mass.App.Ct. 571, 2010 WL 3436833 In 1998, then 4-year-old Kevin Lou was severely injured in the PRC by an escalator made and sold by China Tianjin Otis Elevator Company, Ltd. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm by Ryan Bradley
To make matters worse for those faring Viptera corn, any drift or co-mingling of Viptera corn with un-impacted corn can lead to total contamination and rejection by many elevators. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
MIS appealed, and Horne cross-appealed against Southern Services.The court found, as Horne had conceded, that Southern Services had a qualified privilege, but no merit in Horne's contention that MIS did not have the qualified privilege found by the trial court, elevating dicta in the Court of Appeals' Wetherby v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:48 am by Neumann Law Group
After the initial recall, Harbor Freight Tools began to systematically test all of its jack stand products, as all of the Pittsburg Automotive jack stand product had been manufactured by the same company, Jiaxing Golden Roc Tools Co., Ltd. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:28 pm by Tom Heintzman
Eakins Construction Ltd, [1960] S.C.R. 361. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 1:44 am
His dissenting judgment in Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 213 (reported here on BAILII) is the most powerful and persuasive dissent the IPKat can recall reading. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Christina Bergeron Gugel, No. 10-0513 October 6, 2011 Port Elevator-Brownsville, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 1:58 am
Intellectual property enthusiasts will recall his rulings in Polydor Ltd v Brown [2005] EWHC 3191 (Ch): ignorance no defence to copyright infringement action in respect of connecting a computer to the internet so that others could access audio files; Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc [2005] EWHC 2351 (Ch) - English courts had jurisdiction to hear software dispute even though claim served in US; General Cigar Co v Partagas [2005] EWHC 1729 (Ch), the nightmare CIFUENTES/CIFUENTES WINKS… [read post]